Is Gaza Starving?

The UNDP has published its yearly Human Development Report (HDR) and the results are surprising to say the least. It will put paid to a few received notions held dearly by the moralists of the Left, the Islamists of the religious right and pretty much everything else in between. I say that with irony at full blast and very little confidence, of course.

According to the report, the Occupied Palestinian Territories, which comprises the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, are classified in this broad-based UN Index as having “Medium Human Development”. It places its position at 110 of 182 countries, putting the Palestinian Territories in neither the top nor bottom groups.

And most surprising of all, the country’s HDR index places it ahead of the muslim-majority countries Egypt (123), Indonesia (111), Pakistan (141) and Bangladesh (146).

Posted in International Affairs, Moral relativism | 12 Comments

Hate: Money Or Ideology?

At the start of the clip, Ayaan Hirsi-Ali asks

“What is it that motivates a man like Faisal Shahzad. A man who was living the American dream. Who found a visa to come to this country…”

Then the person interviewing Hirsi-Ali makes an assertion:

“Well I say if he still had a job he wouldn’t have done it. So when economic times become more difficult, young men are drawn more easily [towards radicalism]“

Economic hardship and social alienation are certainly contributory factors to the vacuous, pigshit-thick hooliganism of many of the EDL rank and file. That and good old alcohol-fuelled English exceptionalism.

Islamism, on the other hand, is a messianic ideology concerned with “social justice”, if only superficially, but it certainly isn’t a revolutionary struggle for emancipatory rights for the poor and the unemployed. After all, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, the underpants bomber, was a poor little rich boy who lived in a million pound flat in St John’s Wood, with servants cleaning up after him.

Posted in Islamism | 21 Comments

Where the Twain Should Have Met

This is a cross-post of an article by Christopher Hitchens from The Atlantic from September 2003.


The cosmopolitan Edward Said was ideally placed to explain East to West and West to East. What went wrong?

Edward Said

I first met Edward Said in the summer of 1976, in the capital city of Cyprus. We had come to Nicosia to take part in a conference on the rights of small nations. The obscene civil war in Lebanon was just beginning to consume the whole society and to destroy the cosmopolitanism of Beirut; it was still just possible in those days to imagine that a right “side” could be discerned through the smoke of confessional conflagration. Palestinian resistance to Israeli occupation was in its infancy (as was the messianic “settler” movement among Jews), and the occupation itself was less than a decade old. Egypt was still the Egypt of Anwar Sadat—a man who had placed most of his credit on the wager of “Westernization,” however commercially conceived, and who was only two years away from the Camp David accords. It was becoming dimly apprehended in the West that the old narrative of “Israel” versus “the Arabs” was much too crude. The image of a frugal kibbutz state surrounded by a heaving ocean of ravening mullahs and demagogues was slowly yielding to a story of two peoples contesting a right to the same twice-promised land.

Posted in Orientalism | Leave a comment

The Taliban and its Pakistan puppet masters

The Times has published an article on a new study published by the LSE which uncovers support by the Pakistani government and by Pakistan’s intelligence servcice, the ISI (Inter-Services Intelligence), for the Taliban. The ISI in particular is said to be represented on the Taliban’s war council, the Quetta shura. And up to seven of the 15-man shura are believed to be ISI agents!

There is no doubt that the British left, Islamists and the hinterland of “muslim middle England” will ignore the ramifications of this report and blithely continue doing what they do reflexively: Indulge in the usual toxic cocktail of ‘whataboutery’ and blaming the USA, the “neocons”, Nick Cohen and of course, the Jews Israel.

Pakistani support for the Taliban is prolonging a conflict that has cost the West billions of dollars and hundreds of lives. Last week 32 Nato soldiers were killed.

Posted in International Affairs, Islamism | 3 Comments

The EDL Uncovered

You don’t have to look far into the English Defence League to find its nasty underbelly. And once you find it, it’s not an edifying sight. This is English racism at its most visceral and cowardly and this particular manifestation of it is specifically directed at Southasians, but Southasian muslims in particular. We in Britain haven’t seen this kind of thing since the 1970s but all the signs indicate that it is making a comeback.

Posted in Anti Muslim bigotry, Racism | 1 Comment

Tower Hamlets Stands Up to Haters

This is a cross-post by habibi from Harry’s Place


Here is some news from East London:

TOWN Hall leaders tonight have called for an Islamic conference to be scrapped in London’s East End on June 20, in the wake of a demo planned outside by the English Defence League.

The date was deliberately chosen by the EDL to coincide with the conference at the Troxy venue in Commercial Road, said Tower Hamlets council.

The Troxy must comply with the law and have regard to the impact such an event will have on social cohesion in the East End, the council warned today.

Deputy Leader Josh Peck said: “This Islamic conference is not supported by the council and we call on the Troxy to call it off in the interests of public safety and social cohesion.

“If necessary, we will review our working relationship with the Troxy.”

Posted in Anti Muslim bigotry, Islamism | 6 Comments

Our self-proclaimed demagogues

This is a cross-post from the Pakistan Tribune.


It was bad enough that they could not unequivocally condemn the brutal massacre of nearly 100 Ahmadis in Lahore. Yet the temerity of the leaders of 13 religious and political organisations to label the attack a conspiracy aimed at repealing the discriminatory laws against Ahmadis is nothing short of morally repugnant. If ever these so-called religious leaders had any semblance of moral authority, they have ensured that none remains. In essence, what these people are saying is that the Ahmadis deserve no sympathy from their compatriots simply because their views on faith do not conform to the specifics that these so-called clerics deem within the ambit of the religion. Who appointed them the arbiters of God’s mercy? Who told them that they could create a poisonous environment where Ahmadis are barely considered human? Who told them that they could prevent the rest of us from weeping for their tragedy?

Posted in Freedom of Religion, Islamism | 1 Comment

Sing When You’re Losing!

Sunny Hundal is overjoyed. Evidently Amnesty International have published a report detailing their human rights activism in Afghanistan. Hundal seems to be suggesting that publication of this report legitimises Amnesty UK’s partnership with the jihadi pressure group Cageprisoners:

Wait! I thought they were in league?? I’m getting all confused here, because according to certain defenders of human rights Amnesty was acting LIKE the Taliban. All very confusing isn’t it…. or not.

But surely countering human rights abuses is the the kind of thing Amnesty was set up to do? Wasn’t highlighting human rights abuses rather than contextualising “defensive jihad” precisely their remit? Shouldn’t Amnesty be unapologetic advocates of universal human rights instead of forging partnerships with Cageprisoners whose business is to promote jihadist Islam and its exponents such as Anwar al-Awlaki and Ali al-Timimi?

Posted in Human Rights, Islamism, Moral relativism | 2 Comments

Catholic Magazine Cover Fail

From the HuffPost:

Enjoying the service

Enjoying the service

Posted in Caption Competition | 5 Comments

Pro-Shariah Nonsense from The New Statesman

Good Lord. Now the New Statesman comes out with a position piece advocating shariah law.

As is sadly so often the case, the nuances in the lecture Rowan Williams delivered at the Royal Courts of Justice in February 2008 failed to have any impact on those whose closed minds alit on the word “sharia” and decided he was talking nonsense yet again. In fact, Dr Williams addressed this point very early on when he quoted Tariq Ramadan’s chapter on sharia in his book Western Muslims and the Future of Islam. “In the West,” writes Ramadan, currently Professor of Contemporary Islamic Studies at Oxford, “the idea of Sharia calls up all the darkest images of Islam…It has reached the extent that many Muslim intellectuals do not dare even to refer to the concept for fear of frightening people or arousing suspicion of all their work by the mere mention of the word”.

Posted in Moral relativism, Sharia | 25 Comments
  • Categories

  • Archives