Holding dear the universalist agenda of Human Rights

This is a cross-post by Joseph Mathai from Himal Southasian


Gita Sahgal was suspended from her post as head of the gender unit of Amnesty International consequent to a Sunday Times article published in 7 February 2010. In this article Sahgal expressed her discomfort with the Amnesty International’s collaboration with Moazzam Beg, a former inmate at Guantanomo Bay, in Amnesty’s “Counter Terror With Justice” campaign. She is quoted to have said that for Amnesty “to be appearing on platforms with Britain’s most famous supporter of the Taliban, whom we treat as a human rights defender, is a gross error of judgment.”

On the same day Sahgal issued a statement where she spelt out the essential basis of her discomfort: “The issue is a fundamental one about the importance of the human rights movement maintaining an objective distance from groups and ideas that are committed to systematic discrimination and fundamentally undermine the universality of human rights.”

Posted in Human Rights, Islamism | Leave a comment

The IFE-linked Labour politician and the extremist solicitor

Cllr Lutfur Rahman, the previous Labour leader of Tower Hamlets Council lost his job after he was directly linked to the Islamic Forum Europe (IFE) and Jamaat-e-Islam (JI) in Andrew Gilligan’s Dispatches programme.

He was subsequently struck off the Labour shortlist of candidates for the seat of directly elected Mayor of Tower Hamlets.

The JI-linked Rahman has now launched a “legal challenge” to the selection process . ‘Cutting your noses to spite your face’ is a euphemism that comes to mind in trying to understand this surprising decision by Lutfur Rahman. The legal complaint has sent the entire proceedings into chaos. Ted Jeory quotes a senior Labour member:

“Lutfur’s lot are trying to make out that this is some kind of grass roots uprising against the selection process. Don’t believe a word of it. Actually, it’s a group of businessmen looking for influence and they are promising to back any challenge with money. They’re also saying they’re dong this on behalf of the black and minority ethnic community. Again….wrong. This is about self-interest.”

Posted in Islamism | 3 Comments

It is wrong to ban the good, the bad and Maududi

The Bangladeshi government has banned the works of Maududi and has ordered mosques and libraries to remove all books written by the Islamic scholar and South Asia’s pre-eminent formulist of Islamic clerical fascism.

From a BBC news report:

The Bangladeshi government has ordered mosques and libraries across the country to remove all books written by a controversial Islamic scholar.

The chief of the government-funded Islamic Foundation told the BBC that the books by Syed Abul Ala Maududi encouraged “militancy and terrorism”.

The chief of the government-funded Islamic Foundation told the BBC that the books by Syed Abul Ala Maududi encouraged “militancy and terrorism”.

Mr Maududi – who died in 1979 – is the founder of the Jamaat-e-Islami party.

His works are essential reading for supporters of the Jamaat-e-Islami party in the region.

Posted in Freedom of Expression, Islamism | 12 Comments

A Portrait of the Terrorist as a Young Man

This unintentionally hilarious video could be straight out of Four Lions, but is in fact of Faisal Shahzad, the would-be Times Square terrorist bomber.

Posted in Terrorism | Leave a comment

The Other Muslims

Zeyno Baran

This is a cross-post of an interview by Barry Rubin with Zeyno Baran, senior fellow of the Hudson Institute and editor of The Other Muslims: Moderate and Secular, recently published by Palgrave-Macmillan.

Posted in Islamism, Secularism | 142 Comments

The Burkha Ban in France is Draconian

My opinion piece has been published in the Times:

I grew up in a liberal household in the Middle East where religious practice was never forced on me. But when I was 17 I made the choice to wear the hijab (headscarf), in the belief that this was a religious obligation and symbol of modesty. At times, I even wore the niqab, a veil of thin chiffon cloth that covers the face.

I knew that the niqab wasn’t a religious obligation, unlike the hijab, but I wore it in markets and malls — any place where I wanted to be hidden from the prying eyes of men. Although it was restrictive — it’s difficult to manoeuvre in busy shops, to eat or cross the road — that didn’t bother me. When I wore it, I felt comfortable knowing that my face would not be known, that I would not be leered at by men. And I certainly did not feel out of place. Many women around me wore it, too, not because it was a legal requirement or because of family pressure, but out of choice.

Posted in Secularism | 10 Comments

David Miller only raises more questions

This is a guest post by Shiraz Maher


Professor David Miller, who operates the SpinWatch, SpinProfiles and Neocon Europe websites, has responded to a piece by my colleague Alexander Meleagrou-Hitchens. At best, Miller’s answers are evasive and inadequate.

In the comments section of Alexander’s article, Miller writes:

Meleagrou-Hitchens argues that his profile should not appear on our website Powerbase, because he did not want to feature on a site which in the past ‘published’ the work of racist academic Kevin MacDonald.

Meleagrou-Hitchens well knows that – to our regret – one of our researchers did quote MacDonald on one of our sister sites – as opposed to ‘publishing’ anything by MacDonald.

This could be seen as misdirection by Miller. The difference between ‘quoting’ and ‘reproducing’ would be the terms in which the selected material of MacDonald was represented on the website. As it was, MacDonald’s views were reproduced, at length, and without challenge, on Neocon Europe. The passages appeared in terms which not only seemed to approve of – but also approbated – MacDonald’s views. The Spittoon points out:

Posted in Your View | 20 Comments

Questions David Miller must answer

This is a crosspost by Shiraz Maher


My colleague and comrade Alexander Meleagrou-Hitchens has today explained why he wanted his profile removed from the SpinProfileswebsite operated by Professor David Miller of Strathclyde University.

Hitch the younger was characteristically generous in his response, omitting the wider questions relating to David Miller’s websites and views. I am honour-bound to raise these in defence of a trusty friend.

Miller operates SpinProfiles along with a number of other websites which include SpinWatch and Neocon Europe. The first of these websites came to attention after Alexander requested that his profile be removed from it.

SpinProfiles describes itself as an:

encyclopedia of people, issues, and groups shaping the public agenda that is being written collaboratively on this website. It catalogues descriptions and details of PR firms, activist groups and government agencies as well as the criticisms that are made of these groups from different perspectives.

Posted in Your View | 6 Comments

Paul Berman: What You Can’t Say About Islamism

Paul Berman is very good at getting under the skin of Islamism’s white liberal cognoscenti. His latest book, The Flight of the Intellectuals, has irked almost everyone in that esteemed group. Particularly those who would like to sell us the notion that Islamism is a force for good, or that Isaiah Berlin, and not Sayyid Qutb, is a precursor to Tariq Ramadan.

He also pulls the rug out from under Islamists who are working hard to dress up clerical fascism as a “liberal” antidote to western capitalism and US imperialism. In other words, Berman has a lot of detractors, but he knows how to deal with them.

And how. This came out originally in the WSJ. But you can get past the paywall and read Berman at GayandRight and here:

Posted in Islamism | 8 Comments

Jihad in Saudi Arabia: Violence and Pan-Islamism since 1979

A book for any self-respecting Spittoon reader’s bedtime book list, I should think. And here’s a review from the THE:

How could jihadi violence break out in a country seen as the historical heartland of Islam and ruled by a state that boasts about its many Islamic credentials? Here, Thomas Hegghammer unpacks the paradox of jihadi militancy in an Islamic state.

The book is based on fieldwork in Saudi Arabia, and draws on an impressive collection of biographies and written sources from al-Qaeda websites. Its 10 chapters trace the evolution of militant Islamism and its later containment by Saudi authorities.

Since 9/11, scholars and security specialists have searched for plausible explanations to account for jihadi militancy at local and global levels. Wahhabi radical theology, Western foreign policies, socio-economic deprivation, dictatorships in the Muslim world and, more recently, the rise of the internet, are often cited as causal factors. In a global world, it has become difficult to isolate local conditions from global contexts.

Posted in Islamism | 5 Comments
  • Categories

  • Archives