Sorry, I’m too liberal to condemn stoning

This is a cross-post from Stand For Peace


Next Wednesday, Muhammed ibn Adam Al Kawthari will be at the University of York, hosted by the Islamic Society as part of their ‘Islam Awareness Week’. Al Kawthari is a vile man with abhorrent views.

A Civitas report notes of al-Kawthari:

“He places severe restrictions on male doctors treating female patients; he rules that women may not swim (even for medical reasons) where a male lifeguard is present, or where there are non-Muslim women; using tampons is ‘disliked’ (makruh-a classification in shari’a law); a woman may not travel beyond 48 miles without her husband or a close relative accompanying her; a female is encouraged to remain within the confines of her house as much as possible; polygamy is permissible. If anyone were to ridicule polygamy, he would become an unbeliever; it is a grave sin for a woman to refuse sex to her husband; it is forbidden to have close, intimate relations with or have love for non-Muslims; Muslims are not to sit, eat, live or mingle with them; the legal punishment for adultery is stoning.”[1]

Posted in Sharia, The Left | 2 Comments

Mahfooz Kanwar: On Official Multiculturalism

Mahfooz Kanwar

"If you want to live under sharia law, go back to the hellhole country you came from, or go to another hellhole country that lives under sharia law," says Mahfooz Kanwar, a member of the Muslim Canadian Congress. (Calgary Herald)

Read about Mahfooz Kanwar’s critique of official multiculturalism in Canada:

About one dozen families who recently immigrated to Canada are demanding that the Louis Riel School Division in Winnipeg excuse their children from music and coed physical education programs for religious reasons.

The families believe that music is un-Islamic – just like the Taliban believe and then imposed on the entire population of Afghanistan – and that physical education classes should be segregated by gender even in the elementary years.

The school division is facing the music in a typically Canadian way – that is, bending itself into a trombone to try to accommodate these demands, even though in Manitoba, and indeed the rest of the country, music and phys. ed are compulsory parts of the curriculum.

Posted in Multiculturalism | 3 Comments

Foreign Policy Delusions

Outside of Egypt, support for the overthrow of the Mubarak regime was universal across every political affiliation and stripe. For once Muslims and Islamists, the left and the right cheered on the activists in Maidan Tahrir in downtown Cairo. But last year, we saw no support coming from the far-left and total ambivalence from Muslims and Islamists for the pro-democratic Green Movement as it was being brutally suppressed by the Islamic Regime of Iran.

But then Iran is an Islamic regime which bases its foriegn policy on anti-western doctrine and anti-semitism. These are all factors that the ‘far-left/Islamic-right’ nexus can get behind.

To prove the point: Have you ever heard of a terrorist attack perpetrated by Muslims to protest the way the Iranian regime imprisons, rapes and kills thousands of working class Muslims  - which was then subsequently defended by the liberal-left on the west’s “misguided” foreign policy? No, it’s very unlikely that you will.

Posted in Democracy, Islamism, The Left | 2 Comments

Abdulmutallab’s ISoc and University of Birmingham ISoc – A Connection?

This is a guest post by Mr Happy


Just days after Jalal Ibn Saeed, aka Mister “A good death is a slow one”, was allowed to preach his lecture on death at the University of Birmingham, the peace-loving moderates at the University Islamic Society are hosting Abdul Raheem Green on Saturday 12 February.

Abdul Raheem Green is the hate preacher famous for telling his audience that in the event one’s wife should be strayed from the holy path, feel free to beat her into submission, with the caveat, that the beating should be “very light”. I don’t quite know what a very light beating consists of though Green does tells his audience that your beatings shouldn’t leave a mark on your wife.

It also turns out that Green isn’t that keen on gay people either. In a Harry’s Place piece on hate-preachers hosting a conference at the Ibis hotel, it was reported:

Posted in Hate Speech, Islamism | Leave a comment

…GONE!

Mubarak Steps Down!

Posted in Democracy | 5 Comments

Cameron To Be Sued By Mullah “Dancing Cows” Naseem?

Paul Stott writes:

However wrong Cameron may be on issues ranging from cuts to foreign policy, he can hardly be blamed for associating Birmingham Central Mosque with absurd conspiracy theories. In 2009 the BBC’s Conspiracy Files programme found Mosque Chairman Dr Mohammed Naseem distributing 200 copies of the DVD 7/7 Ripple Effect around the mosque, which propagates the view that Israel was behind the London bombings.

At the time of the 7/7 attacks, Dr Naseem gave a press conference at which he refused to believe Muslims could have been involved in the attacks. The Conspiracy Files programme ended with Dr Naseem meeting leading 9/11 ‘truth’ activist Tony Gosling to plan further work together. Given this background, Dr Naseem may struggle to find a solicitor willing to take his case forward.

That’s a warning to you all, kids. Conspiracy theories screw up your perception of reality.

Posted in Conspiracy Theory Madness, Terrorism | 1 Comment

What Do Douglas Murray and Inayat Bunglawala Have In Common?

In a nutshell. On the position of “state multiculturalism” they are conjoined opposites who both betray liberal principles when they assert Islam, and the people who “adhere” (and I use that term in its loosest sense) to Islam, conform to a homogeneous and immutable religious identity, when it comes to the  issues of diversity of beliefs and equality of rights.

Kenan Malik draws their similarities in a nicely observed piece on the shared values of the anti-Multiculturalism camp and the pro-Multiculturalism camp, the Murrays and the Bunglawalas of the world, and how they are both wrong:

Posted in Multiculturalism | 7 Comments

Mubarak going…going…

Lots of hearsay, rumours and maybes.

Aljazeera condenses the mixed messages:

Hassam Badrawi, the secretary general of the ruling National Democratic Party (NDP), told the BBC and Channel 4 News on that he expected Mubarak to hand over his powers to Omar Suleiman, the vice-president.

“I think the right thing to do now is to take the action that would satisfy … protesters,” Badrawi told BBC television in a live interview.

Ahmed Shafiq, the country’s prime minister, also told the BBC that the president may step down on Thursday evening, and that the situation would be “clarified soon”. He told the Reuters news agency, however, that Mubarak remained in control, and that “everything is still in the hands of the president”.

However, Anas el-Fekky, Egypt’s information minister, denied all reports of Mubarak resigning.

Posted in Democracy | Leave a comment

Muhammad Shafiq and the Ramadhan Foundation

This is a cross-post by Amjad Khan

One of the negative outcomes of the post 7/7 debate on Islamist inspired extremism and terrorism is the fact that some journalists believe that just because someone is a Muslim he/she will inevitably be an expert on Islamist extremism. At first we were subjected to former corner shop owner turned Labour peer, Lord Nazir Ahmed, making bizarre and incomprehensible statements. Then we had to endure the buffoonery of Shahid Malik and Khalid Mehmood, both complete and utter imbeciles who only got elected due to the clan/tribal politics within the Pakistani communities in which they stood. And recently, we have been treated to more stupidity from another clueless and unelected Peer, Sayeedi Warsi.

All of the above mentioned individuals are more reminiscent of characters from ‘Carry On up the Khyber’ rather than serious commenter’s on socio-political issues. Whilst their comments should be viewed as entertainment rather than political analysis, the silliness doesn’t stop there. We now have spokespersons from the Ramadhan Foundation making complete fools of themselves.

Posted in UK Politics | 7 Comments

Lambert: So Wrong On So Many Levels

Bob Lambert came out fighting with a desperate piece in defence of his disastrous thesis, which is unconvincing from the start:

As a result of Cameron’s new policy, several Muslims who al-Qaida strategists regard as serious and credible opponents in the battle for young hearts and minds will be hampered in their important counter-terrorism work. Fortunately, Cameron’s decision to deny effective Muslim community initiatives legitimacy and funding will not entirely halt effective grassroots work against al-Qaida influence but it will reduce its scale and impact. It will also make life difficult for local partnerships where Muslim community groups are branded extremist and subversive by the government. As a consequence, trust and mutual respect between police and Muslim community projects will be replaced by relationships of control and distrust, or no relationships at all – both outcomes serving al-Qaida better than counter-terrorism.

Posted in Islamism, Moral relativism, Nutters | 7 Comments
  • Categories

  • Archives