The month of fasting, sacrifice, self-denial and exertion in all matters spiritual is upon us. Ramadan Kareem!
Pearls of wisdom from George Galloway, Britain’s second highest profile “revert” and Assad supporter.
Warning: Arsehole alert.
Take a look at this 12 year old Egyptian boy, Ali Ahmed, and marvel how he puts Western supporters of the toppled Morsi government to shame. He has understood the politics of the Muslim Brotherhood better than your average Western pro-Islamist “liberal”.
Calling the Brotherhood fascists, Ali gushes forth a stream of consciousness on Morsi’s litany of failures on women’s rights, social and economic inequalities and the Egyptian constitution.
You have to wonder at the cognitive dissonace of Western supporters of Morsi’s deposed Muslim Brotherhood government. Chances are they have never lived in totalitarian Islamist state in a Muslim-majority country. Though they have grown fat on the freedoms and privileges the West offers them, they loathe the idea that those same freedoms should be enjoyed by, say, the people of Egypt.
Let’s see the clowns try and label this young chap an “Islamophobe” and “pro-Western stooge”.
The title of an article by Hazeem Kandil on the LRB blog is “The End of Islamism” trailing with a threatening question mark. He makes some solid points to justify the motivation behind the military coup but whether the toppling of Morsi marks the death knell for Islamist politics is doubtful.
Certainly, the Brothers’ dismal performance in power brought about their downfall, rather than some elaborate debate on the legitimacy of Islamism. There was nothing Islamic about the movement’s policies. On the contrary, the moral image they projected was quickly comprised by the shabby deals they tried (and failed) to strike with old regime institutions, and foreign powers they had previously condemned. Once in power, Morsi praised the Interior Ministry so highly that he even claimed this most patriotic of institutions had been an essential partner in the 2011 revolt; and his aides spared no effort in imploring America to save his presidency. Egyptians became rapidly disillusioned with Islamist incompetence, paranoia, double-dealing and, above all, profound arrogance towards people they regarded as less religious than them.
What do the fascist Nick Griffin (BNP), the totalitarian pro-Islamist George Galloway (RESPECT) and the neo-liberal Douglas Murray all have in common? They all oppose NATO intervention in Syria. A curious and diverse set of opinio-makers all converging on the same point.
On close examination, there are bound to be other points where the three doyennes of British illiberalism will converge, partly because, as any political theorist will tell you, in politics the points of extremism will always meet. In the case of our three protagonists, it is their inherent illiberalism that corrals them together.
Here is a catalogue of reasons why the Labour Party should cut ties with the illiberal Henry Jackson society by James Bloodworth:
The associate director of the HJS is Douglas Murray, a columnist for the Spectator and Standpoint, who joined the organisation in April 2011. In March, Murray wrote an article following the release of the results of the 2011 census in which he bemoaned the fact that in “23 of London’s 33 boroughs ‘white Britons’ are now in a minority”.
It took them more than 70 years of protracted “grassroots activism” to get into power in Egypt and less than one year for the Muslim Brotherhood to be ousted by the very same “grassroots” they sought to govern.
Graffiti near Tahrir Square
In the final analysis, it was Mohamed Morsi’s own inability to compromise and his party’s inherent authoritarian nature that failed the Brotherhood. Or as an Egyptian put it:
“Nasser, Sadat, Mubarak all tried to rid Egypt of the Muslim Brotherhood. In the end it was Morsi who succeeded”
What Egyptians have shown is what they, in their hearts, already knew: that Sharia Law alone is not enough for good governance and Islamists make for worthless administrators. Morsi won an election but he failed to build on the democracy that put him into power. Islamism is not “representative” of the Arab Street nor the Greater Muslim World and it certainly is not “indigenous” to it, as has become popular thinking in some sections of the Liberal Left.
You don’t have to be a Muslim or an apostate to support The Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain (CEMB) and their campaign to help apostates in Islam. Here is their message:
For the past six years, the Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain (CEMB) has been a “beacon of hope” for many.
As the first organisation of its kind, the CEMB has been established to break the taboo that comes with leaving Islam; highlight the problems ex-Muslims face; provide a network for support; raise awareness; and campaign for freedom of belief and expression, atheism and secularism and against apostasy and Sharia laws. According to Elle Quebec magazine, the launch of the ex-Muslim movement was ‘a real revolution.’
James Bloodworth discusses the new report by the One Law for All’s campaign: Siding with the Oppressor: The Pro-Islamist Left.
Because the left doesn’t police its borders in the way that the right has learned to do – social democrats like to pretend the far-left are on the same side as them – extremists regularly sneak into the mainstream on the back of ostensibly progressive front groups.
A good example is Unite Against Fascism.
Launched in 2003 as a response to the electoral activity of the British National Party, UAF spends most of its time these days organising counter demonstrations against the EDL.
An honourable way to pass the time, you might think.
UAF’s definition of what constitutes fascism, however, is a peculiar one. Not only are those advocating the resurrection of a fascistic Islamic caliphate seemingly not worth opposing, they have been actively welcomed into the UAF fold by the leadership.
Channel 4′s decision to broadcast the Islamic call to prayer during the month of Ramadan as a “deliberate act of “provocation” aimed at viewers who associate Islam with terrorism and extremism” has met with a spectrum of reactions.
The decision to broadcast anything based on the need to “provoke” is risible and the motivations of Channel4 verge on sociopathic. But Terry Sanderson at the National Secular Society has a very bright piece which applauds Channel4 which is well worth reading. The NSS position clarifies the misconception that secularism is anti-religion and in fact religious freedoms will always flourish in a secular state and never in a theocratic state.
The hostility that is swirling round this decision to include Islam is understandable, given the events of the past few years. But there are millions of Muslims living quietly and productively in this country, who simply want to observe their religion in peace. They deserve to see their lives reflected on TV, just like everyone else’s.