Category Archives: UK Politics

Muhammad Shafiq and the Ramadhan Foundation

This is a cross-post by Amjad Khan

One of the negative outcomes of the post 7/7 debate on Islamist inspired extremism and terrorism is the fact that some journalists believe that just because someone is a Muslim he/she will inevitably be an expert on Islamist extremism. At first we were subjected to former corner shop owner turned Labour peer, Lord Nazir Ahmed, making bizarre and incomprehensible statements. Then we had to endure the buffoonery of Shahid Malik and Khalid Mehmood, both complete and utter imbeciles who only got elected due to the clan/tribal politics within the Pakistani communities in which they stood. And recently, we have been treated to more stupidity from another clueless and unelected Peer, Sayeedi Warsi.

All of the above mentioned individuals are more reminiscent of characters from ‘Carry On up the Khyber’ rather than serious commenter’s on socio-political issues. Whilst their comments should be viewed as entertainment rather than political analysis, the silliness doesn’t stop there. We now have spokespersons from the Ramadhan Foundation making complete fools of themselves.

Posted in UK Politics | 7 Comments

Haras Rafiq: At long last we have a Prime Minister who rightly makes the distinction between Islam and Islamism

This is a cross-post by Haras Rafiq, a Director of CENTRI, an organisation that specialises in countering extremism.

In the wake of the rise of the Tunisian and Egypt dissent against oppressive, totalitarian regimes, Prime Minister Cameron has come out fighting against one of our own oppressive totalitarian movement in the UK – the Islamists. He is right in his analysis that the only way to tackle the growing rise of Islamist inspired terrorism is to tackle the growing phenomenon that is at the root of the problem – Islamism which has to an extent been sponsored by the state.

As a British Muslim born in the UK, hailing from parents who originally emigrated here in the 1950s, I have seen the rise of Islamist extremism first hand and experienced the tactics and strategies that have been used to promote and grow the capacity for this divisive and dangerous ideology.

Also posted in Islamism | 1 Comment

A disillusioned nationalist exposes the BNP

This is a guest post by 17th Angel. Some details have been removed in the interests of anonymity.

Also posted in Activism, Anti Fascism, Blogosphere, Democracy, European Fascism, Identity Politics, Immigration, Politics, Racism, Your View | 3 Comments

A New Link in Farr’s Pro-Extremist Network?

This is a guest post by Andy Lambert


Last year, the FCO found itself under scrutiny after a senior British diplomat was dragged through the courts after he was said to have been seen yelling ‘Fucking Jews’ in the gym.

More recently the OSCT was found to have recruited a hardline Salafi (and, like Abu Hamza, a former nightclub bouncer) called Asim Hafeez to the delicate position of Head of Interventions.

Unsurprisingly Asim has used this position to shovel heaps of cash to his fellow Salafi friends and has tried (often successfully) to cut funding to moderate and secular Muslim-led groups such as Quilliam.

Asim, incidentally, is also believed to have been involved in the failed attempt by a gang of civil servants led by Charles Farr to invite the extremist preacher Zakir Naik into the UK to give a series of speeches – against the wishes of the Home Secretary.

Also posted in Dodgy Policy Wonks, Islamism | 77 Comments

Baroness Warsi Has Some Explaining To Do

Baroness Warsi, the Conservative party chair and minister “without portfolio”, leaked a sneak preview of her “Islamophobia” speech to the Telegraph the day before she delivered the full speech at the University of Leicester yesterday.

Warsi is right to speak out against the kind of casual anti-Muslim bigotry which has become increasingly noticeable in the day to day language of Britain. We are now living in a climate where  phraseology invoking ”fucking Muslims” is commonplace – and you don’t have to be Muslim to pick up on it. And this is to say nothing of the heightened levels of Muslim baiting which passes for journalism on the pages of the Daily Express and the Daily Mail. The content on both of these organs are both a barometer and weather vane for gauging society’s prejudice du jour. We know from them that English exceptionalism is fickle when it comes to the fear and loathing of minorities which has passed in the space of a generation from jews to blacks to southasians and now, currently, to muslims.

Also posted in Anti Muslim bigotry, The Regressive Left | 4 Comments

The Conservatives and Islamism: The Promises and the Reality

This is a cross-post by Edmund Standing


The promises:

Pauline Neville-Jones, 2008 Conservative Party Conference Speech:

We will ban Hizb-ut-Tahrir – which has just called for American soldiers in the Gulf to be killed.

[...]

We all – Muslims and non-Muslims – must actively face down extremists.

Because the security of our society rests ultimately on the hard-nosed defence of our values and a shared loyalty to them.

Under the next Conservative Government, led by David Cameron, that’s what we will be doing.

Chris Grayling, December 2009 Speech:

We must also be willing to challenge and where necessary to ban groups that mask an ideology of hate behind a public veil of moderation. We have just such an issue with the radical group Hizb’ut Tahrir. Within the UK it takes extreme care about how it words its propaganda. And claims that those who want it banned are completely misplaced.

Also posted in Islamism | Leave a comment

The Duplicity of Jack Straw

Good grief.

Jack Straw reveals more about his own particular ethnicity-bias than he probably wants to when he makes comments as cretinous as this:

“But there is a specific problem which involves Pakistani heritage men … who target vulnerable young white girls.

“We need to get the Pakistani community to think much more clearly about why this is going on and to be more open about the problems that are leading to a number of Pakistani heritage men thinking it is OK to target white girls in this way.”

To which Christopher Dillow’s reaction is suitably irritated:

My problem is that this sort of claim bundles up trivially true statements with contentious ones. It’s trivially true that sex crimes, however rare, are a problem. And it’s trivially true that some Pakistani men are sex criminals, just as some whites are. The question is: why bring ethnicity into it? Are men of Pakistani heritage more likely to commit sex crime than others?

Also posted in Racism | 9 Comments

APPG drops iEngage

Martin Bright brings news that the All Party Parliamentary Group have decided that iEngage are unsuited to the role of secretariat.

This encouraging development was initiated by a scathing and forensic critique of the iEngage agenda by Paul Goodman MP, on ConservativeHome. Goodman clearly has a solid grasp of  the agents of Islamic extremism, their politics and their rhetoric. He writes, with precision, how the Jamaat and Muslim Brotherhood brands of Islamism have been rigorously cultivated, sometimes with the tacit cooperation of officials of the previous Labour government.

Goodman is one of those rare politicians who understands very clearly that Islamist groups are motivated by the need to advance the exclusivist cause of a clique of Islamic extremist groups and organisations whose interests are distinctly detached from the interests of the majority of Muslims. Most British Muslims are not extremist, yet Islamists pretend to represent them without mandate. The majority of British Muslims take a dim view of Islamic fundamentalists and the messianical ideology which underpins it. But Goodman has the wherewithal to see past this façade and understands how to differentiate between genuine bigotry against Muslims and the term “Islamophobia” when it is used by groups like iEngage to silence criticism of religious extremism.

Also posted in Islamism | 1 Comment

Will Mehdi Hasan Condemn Ken Livingstone for hosting a chatshow on PressTV?

So angry is Mehdi Hasan for being mocked by Andrew Gilligan for this puff piece “interview” of Lutfur Rahman, he uses the entire article to blast Gilligan for working for the state funded Iranian broadcaster Press TV. Hasan argues that by doing so, Gilligan took the “shilling” of the Islamic regime of Iran and this was inconsistent with his position on Islamism.

Sources at Press TV tell me Gilligan is among the highest-paid, if not the highest-paid, employee at the channel. So, let’s get this straight. Gilligan is a journalist who makes lots of money from “outing” as many British Muslims as he can as “Islamists” or “extremists”, often on deeply dubious grounds, and with the aid of selective quotation, yet at the same time also makes lots and lots of money working for a foreign country which is explicitly, openly and proudly Islamist and based on the rule of the clerics and a version of sharia law.

Also posted in Islamism, The Regressive Left | 5 Comments

Ken Livingstone: Promoting a RESPECT Stooge

Andrew Gilligan writes on a revealing exchange between Andrew Neil and Ken Livingstone on the matter of election lies.

Ken Livingstone was quick to condemn the election lies put out by the supporters of Phil Woolas about his opponent. Woolas was subsequently disbarred. But when the supporters of the extremist-backed, Respect stooge Lutfur Rahman put out worse lies about his opponent, Helal Abbas, Ken behaved completely differently. Ken had no problem with backing Lutfur and denouncing the Labour candidate  Helal – the victim of the smear campaign as “not credible or competent”. The usual double standards from Ken Livingstone? You better believe it.

Here is how Andrew Neil put Ken on the spot on the BBC, Daily Politics show. The Lutfur section is 13 minutes 35 seconds into this video. But here is a transcript:

Also posted in Sectarianism, Tower Hamlets | 2 Comments
  • Categories

  • Archives