Category Archives: Moral relativism

Pro-Shariah Nonsense from The New Statesman

Good Lord. Now the New Statesman comes out with a position piece advocating shariah law.

As is sadly so often the case, the nuances in the lecture Rowan Williams delivered at the Royal Courts of Justice in February 2008 failed to have any impact on those whose closed minds alit on the word “sharia” and decided he was talking nonsense yet again. In fact, Dr Williams addressed this point very early on when he quoted Tariq Ramadan’s chapter on sharia in his book Western Muslims and the Future of Islam. “In the West,” writes Ramadan, currently Professor of Contemporary Islamic Studies at Oxford, “the idea of Sharia calls up all the darkest images of Islam…It has reached the extent that many Muslim intellectuals do not dare even to refer to the concept for fear of frightening people or arousing suspicion of all their work by the mere mention of the word”.

Also posted in Sharia | 25 Comments

Morality Bypass

Ten muslims are shot and killed aboard a flotilla bound for Gaza and the world erupts in righteous moral indignation. Elsewhere, more than 100 Ahmadi muslims are slaughtered while they pray peaceably in two separate mosques in the city of Lahore in Pakistan, a country which refuses even to recognise them as equal citizens and sanctions state-sponsored violence against them, and there is near total silence.

Here is an excerpt from an article which compares the unequal responses by political groups, the media and various human rights organisations in Pakistan to the Flotilla atrocity with the mosque massacre of Ahmadis in Lahore. It highlights the skewed moral relativities and the morality bypass which turns some into vocal critics of violence perpetrated against muslims when committed by non-muslim actors (particularly when they are Americans or jews), but maintain a studied silence when muslims savagely oppress their own people.

Posted in Moral relativism | 19 Comments

The Illiberal French Burkha Ban

Norman Geras refutes/dismantles Christopher Hitchens’ poorly argued support of the French burkha ban in seven bullet points. Here’s the first of them:

This, I’m sorry to say, is how it strikes me as being with Christopher Hitchens’s piece in Slate supporting the French move to outlaw the burqa. He has plenty of arguments, but not one of them is compelling. Christopher tries, first, to present the agents of the prospective legislation as not seeking to impose a ban.

To the contrary, they are attempting to lift a ban: a ban on the right of women to choose their own dress, a ban on the right of women to disagree with male and clerical authority…

Also posted in Civil Rights | 45 Comments

G!D the “misogynist” and other cyclical lepidopterisms

thanks to the delightful sonia from pickled politics, i ended up in a jolly discussion over at butterflies and wheels on feminism and religion. they seem to have closed the comments for some reason, but i still thought it was an interesting subject and thought i’d continue it here if anyone (like ophelia benson or amy clare) was interested. there are some unresolved questions. amy asks:

“Do Anglicans, even moderates, really think of G!D as a sexless being? I was under the impression that most moderate religious people still think of G!D as male. People could use the singular ‘they’ and refer to a ‘parent’ if they were really that bothered.”

Also posted in Blogosphere, Esoterica, Ethics, Exegesis, Feminism, Hermeneutics, Human Rights, Interfaith, Jewish Extremism, Obscurantism, Secularism | 8 Comments

Reply to Sunny Hundal: Tell us the difference between Al-Awlaki and Mehsud

Given the kind of wild approximations and sweeping generalisations Sunny Hundal makes here, it might not hurt him to trouble himself with some data on terrorist attacks in Pakistan.

The number of fatalities due to terrorist violence in Pakistan between 2003 and 2009 came to 25,070. The largest number of deaths occurred in 2009, which came to 11,585 in one year alone.

The SATP report where I get this information from also says

“Since media access is heavily restricted in the troubled areas of Pakistan, and there is only fitful release of information by Government agencies and media reportage, the actual figures could be much higher”.

Also posted in Human Rights | 57 Comments

How an “Imperialist” Schoolgirl Trashed A “Post-Colonial” Academic

Alaina Podmorov is a 13 year old girl from Canada who started a humanitarian campaign for the education of girls and women in Afghanistan.

She wrote this article in response to a masters’ thesis by the University of British Columbia’s Melanie Butler. This is a snippet from Alaina’s article:

Also posted in Human Rights, Obscurantism | 10 Comments

Why “Attack” When You Can Perform “Ritual Protest”?

Don’t you just love the weird and wonderful effects of moral relativism?

Three men from Al-Muhajiroun have been arrested and charged after an attack on George Galloway MP on Saturday 10 April.

George Galloway was set upon by a group of Muslim extremists while campaigning in East London this afternoon. Three men, believed to belong to the extreme sect Islam4UK, the latest name for Al-Muhajiroun, were arrested and subsequently charged with public order offences.
Galloway, who is standing in the Poplar and Limehouse constituency, was with a party of supporters in Watney Market around 3pm when he and his colleagues were first abused and then attacked by the group.

“They called me a filthy Kaffir” said Galloway, “and shouted that no one should shake the ‘filthy Kaffir’s hand’. This lot are the latest incarnation of the banned group Al-Muhajiroun. They don’t want Muslims to vote, they don’t believe in democracy, and because I encourage Muslims to vote and take a full part in our society they hate me. My party, Respect, is the antidote to these despicable extremists.”

Posted in Moral relativism | 6 Comments

Cordone Back Peddles Furiously

Claudio Cordone has furiously back-peddled from this position on “defensive jihad” as a justifiable human right, in an exclusive interview with the Jerusalem Post:

“There is a misunderstanding around this whole thing, because I wasn’t talking about a general concept of jihad in self-defense or anything else. I was referring to the specific views of Moazzam Begg, because he was being accused of being involved in or advocating violence, discrimination and so on. So we looked at what he has said. We have been with him on a number of occasions when he spoke publicly about Guantanamo and did not find anything [to corroborate the accusations against him.]“

Posted in Moral relativism | Leave a comment

No Internal Debate At Amnesty AGM

Eric Lee submitted his emergency resolution to Amnesty’s Annual General Meeting to have the opportunity to discuss the fallout of the Moazzam Begg-Gita Sahgal controversy and its repurcussions. So how did Amnesty reply?

Dear Eric

Thank you for submitting your resolution on Gita Saghal.

Unfortunately we are not able to accept this resolution.

There is currently an investigation under way at the International Secretariat in relation to Gita Saghal which is being carried out in accordance with the IS’s established human resource policies and UK employment law. The investigation is clearly carried out confidentially in line with established human resource practices and accordingly we do not believe it would be helpful, or carry any weight in the outcome of this investigation, for the AGM to debate the specific issue of Ms Saghal’s employment

Posted in Moral relativism | 9 Comments

What Ails the British Left

Ian McEwan took a real incident that happened at the Institute of Contemporary Arts (ICA) and used it as a plot device in the narrative of the protagonist in his new novel, Solar.

Nick Cohen recognises the incident in McEwan’s storyline and recollects the real events that took place at the ICA which involved comedian Chris Morris, author Martin Amis, Andrew Anthony on the panel and an ICA auditorium audience full of irate, sanctimonious, post-modernist, middle class liberals in a marvellous article on what ails the British left. Luckily, Padraig Reidy of Index on Censorship was also in the audience that night.

Here is Reidy’s hilarious account of the events at the ICA from a CiF piece from 2007, ‘When liberals attack!’:

It was at this point that TV’s greatest satirist [Chris Morris], the shaggy-haired Swift of our age, took his turn to speak.

And what a wonderful turn it was.

Posted in Moral relativism | 1 Comment
  • Categories

  • Archives