Category Archives: Human Rights

Is this the “counter-Enlightenment”?

i’ve not posted for a while, mostly because of pressure of work, but there are a number of things which are currently causing me to more or less lose sleep.

recently, i gave up posting on pickled politics, partly because of the level of personal animosity i was facing, but mostly just in frustration at my apparent inability to get my point across. now, i suppose i have nobody very much to blame for that apart from myself, but i’ve never felt that was a problem before now. now, i think i’m starting to work out what it is that is bothering me; certainly, it’s not about the denizens of one blog, or even the blogosphere, or even the media. it’s not any one set of views, not any one person, but a set of trends, a collective movement i sense in wider society.

Also posted in Anti Fascism, Anti Muslim bigotry, Antisemitism, Blogosphere, Christian Evangelical Nutters, Civil Rights, Democracy, Entryism, European Fascism, Freedom of Expression, Freedom of Religion, Identity Politics, Interfaith, Islamism, Jewish Extremism, Moral relativism, Multiculturalism, Obscurantism, Sectarianism, Secularism, The Far Left, The Regressive Left, UK Politics | 37 Comments

Jamaat Leaders Arrested For Genocide

This is a cross-post by Tendance Coatesy


Bangladesh 1971: One of the Worst Genocides of the 20th Century

The International Crimes Tribunal yesterday issued arrest warrants against already detained four Jamaat-e-Islami leaders on charges of committing genocide and crimes against humanity and peace during the Liberation War.

“Warrants of arrest should be issued against these four people to ensure effective and proper investigation,” Tribunal Chairman Justice Nizamul Huq said allowing the prosecution prayer after submission of Chief Prosecutor Golam Arif Tipu.

The four Jamaat leaders are Ameer Motiur Rahman Nizami, Secretary General Ali Ahsan Muhammad Mojahid and senior assistant secretaries general Muhammad Kamaruzzaman and Abdul Quader Molla.

More Here. Hat-Tip to Enty.

Jamaat Leaders Arrested for War Crimes

By Faheem Haider

Also posted in Islamism | 51 Comments

When Tariq Met Mona

Take a look at the video of the fascinating discussion on the banning of the niqab which saw the Mona Eltahawy, British-Egyptian feminist take on Tariq Ramadan’s dishonest dissembling.

The debate was electric, not least because this is probably one of the only times you will ever hear the “Muslim right wing” as a stakeholder in the niqab debate identified on British TV.

Kirsty Wark: But the question, surely, is not whether there are feminist reasons for wearing the veil or not. It is ‘why is wearing the veil becoming more prevalent rather than less prevalanet’?

Mona Eltahawy: I think it has become more prevalent because the space has been left completely uncontested to the Muslim right wing which does not respect anyone’s rights whatsoever except for this one right to cover a woman’s face. No one has pushed back against the Muslim right wing. I detest the political right wing but I equally detest the Muslim right wing and I will not sacrifice women. Integration has largely failed across Europe even in the UK, with multiculturalism. But we’re not going to sacrifice women for it.

Also posted in Islamism | 16 Comments

Holding dear the universalist agenda of Human Rights

This is a cross-post by Joseph Mathai from Himal Southasian


Gita Sahgal was suspended from her post as head of the gender unit of Amnesty International consequent to a Sunday Times article published in 7 February 2010. In this article Sahgal expressed her discomfort with the Amnesty International’s collaboration with Moazzam Beg, a former inmate at Guantanomo Bay, in Amnesty’s “Counter Terror With Justice” campaign. She is quoted to have said that for Amnesty “to be appearing on platforms with Britain’s most famous supporter of the Taliban, whom we treat as a human rights defender, is a gross error of judgment.”

On the same day Sahgal issued a statement where she spelt out the essential basis of her discomfort: “The issue is a fundamental one about the importance of the human rights movement maintaining an objective distance from groups and ideas that are committed to systematic discrimination and fundamentally undermine the universality of human rights.”

Also posted in Islamism | Leave a comment

Human Rights Watch apologises to Peter Tatchell

This is a Press Release from Peter Tatchell

“Inappropriate, disparaging, inaccurate, condemnatory and intemperate personal attacks,” acknowledges HRW


“Apology accepted, let’s move on and work together,” urges Peter Tatchell

London – 30 June 2010

Human Rights Watch (HRW) has made a full and unreserved apology to human rights rights campaigner Peter Tatchell.

The apology has been made by HRW’s Executive Director, Kenneth Roth, in New York.

It says sorry for a series of untrue and personal attacks on Mr Tatchell, made by the head of HRW’s lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) programme, Scott Long.

The full text of the apology follows below, including statements by Kenneth Roth, Scott Long and Peter Tatchell.

The apology by Human Rights Watch acknowledges that Mr Long made a series of “inappropriate…disparaging…inaccurate…condemnatory…intemperate personal attacks” on Peter Tatchell.

Also posted in Defamation | Leave a comment

Sing When You’re Losing!

Sunny Hundal is overjoyed. Evidently Amnesty International have published a report detailing their human rights activism in Afghanistan. Hundal seems to be suggesting that publication of this report legitimises Amnesty UK’s partnership with the jihadi pressure group Cageprisoners:

Wait! I thought they were in league?? I’m getting all confused here, because according to certain defenders of human rights Amnesty was acting LIKE the Taliban. All very confusing isn’t it…. or not.

But surely countering human rights abuses is the the kind of thing Amnesty was set up to do? Wasn’t highlighting human rights abuses rather than contextualising “defensive jihad” precisely their remit? Shouldn’t Amnesty be unapologetic advocates of universal human rights instead of forging partnerships with Cageprisoners whose business is to promote jihadist Islam and its exponents such as Anwar al-Awlaki and Ali al-Timimi?

Also posted in Islamism, Moral relativism | 2 Comments

If a tree falls in the forest, does Pakistan have any liberals?

Declan Walsh provides superb background on the social and religious inequities, marginalisation and oppression historically suffered by Pakistan’s Ahmadi community.

He presses home a point that I made here. On the complete silence that followed the massacre of more than 100 Ahmadi worshippers in 2 mosques in Lahore, in contrast to the “tsunami of outrage” of the Israeli flotilla attack.

The apathy and reticence displayed by Pakistan’s so-called “liberal elites” shows a lack of humanity that is downright repugnant. But given their silence, Walsh makes a valid point about their numbers. It raises the question, based on a famous ethical conundrum: If 100+ Ahmadi muslims are murdered in cold blood and Pakistan’s liberals do not make a noise, are there any liberals in Pakistan to speak of, at all?

Also posted in Freedom of Religion | 7 Comments

In The Room The Women Come And Go

Via Shiraz Socialist, this is a cross-post by Max Dunbar


Via Sunny Hundal at Pickled Politics, I’ve come across an excellent piece by Gita Sahgal, recently fired by Amnesty for speaking out against its gushing promotion of Taliban enthusiast Moazzam Begg and his fundamentalist CagePrisoners phony human rights group. (Here is the whole sorry tale.)

Sunny doesn’t care for the article – which is not surprising, for smart women dissidents get a hard time from the left these days. Western feminism consists of complaining about Sex and the City 2 rather than international solidarity with women in appalling circumstances.

Yet Sahgal makes a couple of important points. The first is about priorities. The issue of possible hijab bans has been raised yet again. There are good arguments for and against the ban. As Ophelia says, it’s progress that Sarkozy has called the burqa what it is – an instrument of oppression – but we should hesitate to draft laws that specifically target immigrants and ethnic minorities. People should be able to dress how they choose.

Posted in Human Rights | 1 Comment

Constitutionally Protected Oppression

Pakistanis are constitutionally protected to deny full citizenship to their minority Ahmadiyya community and to gun them down in their mosques as they pray.

An Ahmadi muslim explains:

But don’t expect any ‘international condemnation’ of this kind.

Also posted in Freedom of Religion | 1 Comment

Amnesty: working against oblivion?

This is a cross-post by Gita Sahgal from Open Democracy


Salman Rushdie has said, ‘When people are told that they cannot freely re-examine the stories of themselves, and the stories within which they live, then tyranny is not very far away’. Forty nine years ago, this week, Peter Benenson struck a blow against tyranny by announcing the formation of a new organization to support forgotten prisoners who were jailed solely for their beliefs.

This week, Amnesty International launches its Annual Report and starts year long preparations for a jamboree titled Amnesty@50.  From a small group of activists it has grown into a gigantic, global organization. And in many ways, has come to resemble the forces that it has done so much to oppose. Its record of handling one of the greatest challenges to its reputation suggests that it is entirely unable to examine the story of itself or the story of its times. So difficult is it for Amnesty International to provide a coherent account of what has happened over the last few months, that it has chosen to provide no account at all.

Posted in Human Rights | Leave a comment
  • Categories

  • Archives