Author Archives: Faisal

The Reactionary Public

To an outsider, Pakistan’s perceptions of its own political history appears to be mired in a culture of ‘whataboutery’, denial and deflection. So it is encouraging to read the occasional piece by Pakistani political commentator Nadeem Paracha because he does not patronise his readers with yet another analysis of Pakistan’s sectarian unrest by putting the blame on Zionists and US drone attacks. When it comes to talking truth to power, Paracha seems less affected by the culture of denial that afflicts most of his peers.

Here’s Paracha reflecting on how the military and the orthodox religious establishment of Pakistan have contributed and cultivated the heady mixture of nationalism, political Islamic extremism and sectarianism that currently assails Pakistan:

Here’s a question: How come whenever there’s a drone attack (in which most of those killed generally are extremists), or a case of perceived obscenity or blasphemy surfaces, street corners are at once filled with burqa-clad women and bearded men chanting slogans like ‘Death to infidels’? But none of these fine, sensitive Muslims can be seen protesting when there’s an attack on innocent civilians – Ahmadis or others – by the extremists?

Posted in Islamism, Sectarianism | 1 Comment

Turkish Deceit

Last week, Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu gave the USA a stern lecture on its role in the Flotilla incident, and revelled in his own “with us or without us” moment:

“Psychologically, this attack is like 9/11 for Turkey. We expect full solidarity with us. It should not seem like a choice between Turkey and Israel. It should be a choice between right and wrong, between legal and illegal.”

That’s an impressive job of grandstanding by Davutoglu, but let’s not forget that in the “choice between right and wrong” and in the not so distant past, Turkey had few scruples when it leveraged its alliance with the US and Israeli security organisations to help them to track down and imprison the Kurdish leader Abdullah Ocalan.

Posted in International Affairs, Israel/Palestine | 12 Comments

Coming Out as an atheist

This is a brave and thoughtful article in CiF by Alom Shaha. It is 2010, yet this is an account by a man born into a muslim family who is careful not to offend or disappoint family and friends by “coming out” as an atheist. This article will be very helpful to those muslims who cannot articulate this statement, not just because of the ridiculous ‘Law of Apostasy’ which has little chance of being applied in Britain, but because of the fear of severing the ties that bind.

Well done Mr Shaha.

I am an atheist. I imagine that the typical Cif belief reader may not think this is a particularly big deal, but it is for me, because I’m not just an atheist – I’m an apostate from Islam. Apparently there are people who would happily kill me for making such a statement. But I’m not expecting to be killed, or even threatened; despite what the BNP and certain elements of the press might want you to think, the overwhelming majority of Muslims are not rabid fundamentalists who respond with violence to every perceived slight.

Posted in Esoterica | 1 Comment

Constitutionally Protected Oppression

Pakistanis are constitutionally protected to deny full citizenship to their minority Ahmadiyya community and to gun them down in their mosques as they pray.

An Ahmadi muslim explains:

But don’t expect any ‘international condemnation’ of this kind.

Posted in Freedom of Religion, Human Rights | 1 Comment

Morality Bypass

Ten muslims are shot and killed aboard a flotilla bound for Gaza and the world erupts in righteous moral indignation. Elsewhere, more than 100 Ahmadi muslims are slaughtered while they pray peaceably in two separate mosques in the city of Lahore in Pakistan, a country which refuses even to recognise them as equal citizens and sanctions state-sponsored violence against them, and there is near total silence.

Here is an excerpt from an article which compares the unequal responses by political groups, the media and various human rights organisations in Pakistan to the Flotilla atrocity with the mosque massacre of Ahmadis in Lahore. It highlights the skewed moral relativities and the morality bypass which turns some into vocal critics of violence perpetrated against muslims when committed by non-muslim actors (particularly when they are Americans or jews), but maintain a studied silence when muslims savagely oppress their own people.

Posted in Moral relativism | 19 Comments

Israel: Lost at sea

This video is distressing to watch and listen to. The report shows the Israeli army continuing to fire live ammunition at passengers even after they had raised a white flag.

Bradley Burston’s opinion piece in Haaretz comments on Israel following this inexplicable display of irrationality and barbarity.

Here in Israel, we have still yet to learn the lesson: We are no longer defending Israel. We are now defending the siege. The siege itself is becoming Israel’s Vietnam.

Of course, we knew this could happen. On Sunday, when the army spokesman began speaking of a Gaza-bound aid flotilla in terms of an attack on Israel, MK Nahman Shai, the IDF chief spokesman during the 1991 Gulf war, spoke publicly of his worst nightmare, an operation in which Israeli troops, raiding the flotilla, might open fire on peace activists, aid workers and Nobel laureates.

Update: Hussein Ibish’s thoughtful remarks on this terrible unforced error.

Posted in Israel/Palestine | 36 Comments

“Every Muslim Should Be A Terrorist”

Everybody Loves Zakir

Zakir Naik, the Indian-born tele-evangelist for Peace TV, whose inflammatory remarks include extolling Muslims to “terrorise terrorist America” and who states western women make themselves “more susceptible to rape” by wearing revealing clothing, has been allowed into the country.

Naik will be appearing at Wembley Arena in London and in Sheffield on his British tour. David Davies, the Tory MP for Monmouth, who described him as a “hate-monger”, the last time this Naik was allowed Britain in 2006.

There are few “hate-mongers” who are as popular or as revered by Muslims as Dr Zakir Naik. The man’s profile is massive and, thanks to the Peace TV footprint, his lectures are pumped out to millions of Muslims all around the world who avidly consume Naik’s diatribes. He is not affiliated to any Islamist political group nor is he known to have connections to any terrorist groups. He’s just your average muslim geezer with a big television audience.

Posted in Uncategorized | 5 Comments

“Islamism”: Offended By Terminology

Here is an example of Sunny Hundal’s tendency to promote the kind of pickled politics that he once purported to oppose. He has chosen to host an article supporting muslim identity politics written by Mohammad Amin of the Conservative Muslim Forum, who is also a candidate for the leadership of the Muslim Council of Britain.

Amin is apparently opposed to the use of term “Islamism” because he believes it conflates violent jihadi extremism with the peaceful mobilisation of democratic political parties composed of “devout” muslims. Presumably he is opposed to violent jihad as a means to take over political institutions but supports the second methodology which advocates the organisation of muslims using peaceful democratic means.

However, upon a closer reading it becomes clear that the authors have conflated two very distinct agendas: One is the desire to overthrow governments by force and impose a particular vision of society. The other is the desire from an Islamic perspective to peacefully remake Muslim communities from within by encouraging Muslims to be more devout and by encouraging non-Muslims to learn about Islam.

Posted in Islamism | 28 Comments

Sectarianism and the Legacy of Mawdudi

Writing on his new blog, Inayat Bunglawala is upset by the aftermath of the horrific anti-Ahmadi killings in two mosques in Lahore in Pakistan. For a man who campaigned against the Ahmadi community when he was at the Muslim Council of Britain, we would query the crocodile quality of his tears.

He asks the question:

“More to the point who is actually teaching these murderers to engage in these kinds of acts?”

We might now know who taught the gunmen specifically, but we do know from whose teachings their ideology is directly derived. The extremist Salafi sectarianism and anti-Ahmaddiyya stance of the perpetrators of the mosque attacks comes straight out of the deeds and philosophy of Mawlana Mawdudi, the founder of Jamaat-e-Islam. Mawdudi’s teachings are bedrock to the Muslim Council of Britain, the Islamic Forum Europe and, in the not-so-distant past, Inayat Bunglawala himself.

Posted in Sectarianism | 2 Comments

Pakistan’s jihad against the Internet

As you may have read, facebook is banned in Pakistan. Shiraz Maher discusses the dangerous implications:

The Lahore High Court banned Facebook after the social networking site was used to promote a viral campaign called: ‘Everyone draw Mohammed day’. Muslims generally regard any artistic depiction of Mohammed as blasphemous.

But why stop there? Pakistan rarely does things by halves so Youtube, Flickr, Wikipedia, and Blackberry services have also been proscribed “in view of [their] growing sacrilegious content”.

But what are the incidents that led up to the Lahore High Court ruling for the ban and what can be said of the precedent this sets? Urooj Zia writes in himal, tracing the background to the internet ban in Pakistan and string of related international events which set of the ruling by the Lahore court.

Posted in Freedom of Expression | Leave a comment
  • Categories

  • Archives