Brian Whittaker on CiF writes:
Islamist ideology certainly needs to be challenged. The question is whether its nonviolent form should included in an anti-terrorism strategy.
But does the Guardian actually challenge Islamist ideology at all? In the last two days two articles have appeared in both its print and electronic channels which suggest that far from challenging Islamist ideology, it has dropped all pretence of providing any critical evaluation of the exponents of Islamism.
Both articles involve a briefing document by the Quilliam Foundations sent to Charles Farr, director of the Office for Security and Counter-Terrorism, with recommendations on counter-terrorism policy. The report was for Farr’s eyes only but has been leaked.
Quilliam’s document contained a list of organisations, all of whom have aligned themselves with Islamist ideologies and with known links to publicly identified extremist groups.
Following the leak, there were the usual responses from Muslims sympathetic in one way or another to these groups:


