following an unusually thoughtful broadcast last week by richard dawkins (he’s obviously trying to take on board how much his militancy turns people off by some of the pleas he made on behalf of sacred texts as fine language, cultural literacy and so on) i am grappling again with some of the issues raised by faith schools in the critical thinking debate. dawkins, as per usual, lumped all faith schools together as a) proponents of segregation (for which there is some justification) and b) closers, rather than openers of young minds – the segment in which he, somewhat exasperatedly, grappled with the islamic school science class with an apparent 100% rejection of evolution was a powerful statement. however, also as per usual, he implied (by saying that he “worried that”) this was inevitable in a situation where the parents’ wishes about what they wanted their children exposed to overruled the presumed human rights of children to make up their own mind about what they thought was interesting or worthwhile. this argument was given short shrift by a catholic educationalist from northern ireland, who told him he was simply imposing his own expectations over those of the parents concerned; i personally thought they struggled with the editing a little if they were seeking to show that the wishes of parents were unreasonable; this wasn’t the strongest argument i’ve ever seen against faith schools. in my opinion, they’d have done better to concentrate on the ethos of these schools as exclusivist and contrary to “community cohesion”, but then again, what do i know?
Recent Comments
- Zeenat Muhammed on Embryology in the Qur’an Debunked
- Amin on Farewell Christopher Hitchens
- Amin on Javed Ahmad Ghamidi Flees Pakistan
- Amin on Allah and the Big Questions
- Abu Faris on Allah and the Big Questions
- Saleem Tahir on Javed Ahmad Ghamidi Flees Pakistan
- Gary on Farewell Christopher Hitchens
- ygcouhs on Supergrass Moazzam Begg Informed on Shaker Aamer
- Ali on Arab racism against Indians and Pakistanis
- Amin on 11 February: A Day to Defend Free Expression
- fatpie42 on The Guardian and David Miller
- Amin on 11 February: A Day to Defend Free Expression
- Gary on 11 February: A Day to Defend Free Expression
- Amin on 11 February: A Day to Defend Free Expression
- Gary on 11 February: A Day to Defend Free Expression
- Amin on 11 February: A Day to Defend Free Expression
- Gary on 11 February: A Day to Defend Free Expression
- Amin on 11 February: A Day to Defend Free Expression
- Amin on Allah and the Big Questions
- Gary on 11 February: A Day to Defend Free Expression
-
Recent Posts
- Al-Muhajiroun’s Plans for Mumbai-style Terrorist Attacks Foiled
- The Guardian and David Miller
- India’s Shame: Rushdie banned from the Jaipur Lit Festival
- Profile: Øyvind Strømmen
- 11 February: A Day to Defend Free Expression
- Supergrass Moazzam Begg Informed on Shaker Aamer
- Allah and the Big Questions
- Disappearing stories and evidence
- Farewell Christopher Hitchens
- On Pakistan and the creation of Bangladesh on Radio 4
- The Men Behind Yahya in the Indo-Pak War of 1971
- Hamza Yusuf: ‘If you hate the west, emigrate to a Muslim country’
- Salafi Fascists Bust Up Debate
- Godspeed You Black Iraqis
- “Illegal Sexual Intercourse”

