Amnesty Prefers Jihadists to Feminists

It’s official. Amnesty International’s policy on human rights advocacy in Afghanistan or Pakistan encompasses your average jihadist’s right to wage “asymetrical resistance”. This means is that Amnesty has now decided that indiscriminate attacks by jihadists on their “enemies” which often includes the loss of life of innocent civilians is not antithetical to human rights. For Amnesty, the rights of women and heterodox muslims, and other ‘collateral damage’ of “jihad”, are secondary to the human rights of “jihad in self-defence”.

Nick says:

Well, given the contortions in modern liberalism, Amnesty’s abandonment of universal human rights was always likely. In the 2000s I wrote that Amnesty was becoming equivocal about political violence, torture, racism and the hatred of women and gays if abuse could not be blamed on the West. (Here scroll down.) Still, its final collapse remains a melancholy spectacle and a shocking one.

Gita Sahgal, its women’s officer, has finally decided to resign. In her resignation statement she says that Amnesty remains unconcerned that its poster boy Moazzam Begg, a former Guantanamo detainee, is now involved with an organisation called Cageprisoners which has championed the views of jihadists. “They have stated that the idea of jihad in self defence is not antithetical to human rights; and have explained that they meant only the specific form of violent jihad that Moazzam Begg and others in Cageprisoners assert is the individual obligation of every Muslim.” This is the sly liberal’s get-out-of-jail card: a one-sided cultural determinism. Jihadism is a part of “Muslim” culture, says Amnesty, so we cannot criticise it, indeed we must promote it. Yet if the head of a pro western intelligence agency were to say that colonialism was part of his cultural inheritance, Amnesty would condemn him as a racist.

Support for religious reaction and support for the rights of women are, of course, incompatible. Amnesty has made its choice, and as Gita announces, its Stop Violence Against Women campaign is over.

This entry was posted in Feature, Human Rights. Bookmark the permalink. Trackbacks are closed, but you can post a comment.

6 Comments

  1. Posted April 12, 2010 at 12:42 PM | Permalink

    Bastards.

  2. Posted April 12, 2010 at 3:40 PM | Permalink

    It’s a good day for salafi jihadism.

  3. Effendi
    Posted April 15, 2010 at 11:49 PM | Permalink

    What do we want?
    Defensive Jihad!
    When do we want it?
    Now!

    (courtesy of Cage Politics/Pickled Prisoners/Earwigc Ridley/Sunny Bunglawala)

  4. hadid
    Posted April 19, 2010 at 4:18 PM | Permalink

    Nick says:

    This being Nick Cohen the supporter of torture. What an impressive candidate to use to argue for human rights !!!!!

  5. hadid
    Posted April 19, 2010 at 4:22 PM | Permalink

    What do we want?
    Invasion of Muslim countries and slaughter of Muslims (who are terrorists if they defend themselves from invaders)
    When do we want it?
    Now!

    (courtesy of Harrys Plaice/Mad Mel/Shitoon/Douglas Curry)

  6. bro
    Posted April 20, 2010 at 4:48 PM | Permalink

    AMNESTY PREFERS JIHADISTS TO FEMINISTS

    Spitoon prefers extremist fundamentalist Jews like contributor bananabrain
    who follows the 613 mitzvot which are full of misogyny, genocide and racism
    to moderate secular liberal reform Jews

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

  • Categories

  • Archives