What is and isn’t Islam?

This is interesting. Found in The Asian News

What is and isn’t Islam?

By Dr. Nikolaos van Dam

IT is not only important to explain what Islam really is, but it is also important to make a distinction between what Islam involves, and what people have incorrectly associated with and attributed to it.

What is the relation between Islam and the actions of people that practice the Muslim faith? In my opinion there are many things which have very little to do with Islam as a religion, but are nevertheless ascribed to it because the people who are linked to it happen to be Muslims.

Certain radical actions have been carried out by Muslim individuals or groups in the name of Islam, but those actions are not supported by the majority of Muslims, and are generally disapproved of by them, although sometimes their disapproval is not explicit enough to create the impression that the radical Muslims that carry out these actions do not in any way represent any Muslim majority.

All this has contributed to existing misunderstandings. Many of these misunderstandings have to do with false perceptions, but not with academic reality. Although one might also argue that perceptions become academic realities if people believe their perceptions to be true.

The responsibility of scholars – both Muslim and non-Muslim – is therefore to subject these perceptions to a reality test, particularly if this can help in providing a global forum which would help create better mutual understanding, as well as a stronger cross-cultural friendship.

Islam is a hot topic in the West – and not only there, but also in the Muslim world itself. Many people talk about it, but much fewer people are knowledgeable about it. If you want to organise a seminar on “Democracy in South East Asia”, for instance, it may not be that easy to raise funds for it. But if you add the word “Islam”, and make it about the role of democracy and Islam in Southeast Asia, your chances become much better.

Nevertheless, it may be wrong to stress the idea of any connection between Islam and developments in the world. The danger exists that Islam becomes a kind of fixation, thereby adding to a misunderstanding between Muslims and non-Muslims or between so-called Muslim countries and non-Muslim countries.

When Islam spread outside the Arabian Peninsula and came into contact with other cultures, Islam adapted itself to these regions in the sense that various local habits and traditions were not only accepted as not contradicting those of Islam, but were later on sometimes interpreted by the local populations as being in line with Islam, if not Islamic. Many new Muslims continued part of their former traditions and gradually came to argue that these traditions were in fact part of Islam.

More generally, one might say that in large parts of Indonesia Islam has adapted itself to the local cultures and traditions, or has embedded itself into them, instead of adapting to the culture and traditions of the Arabian Peninsula. A similar phenomenon could be said to have taken place in other regions of what today is considered to be the Muslim world. In many places people interpret local habits or traditions as part of Islam, whereas they are not really. Also cultural manifestations based on different religious-cultural backgrounds generally coexist peacefully together in Indonesia.

Other Muslim countries have their own examples concerning the local cultural heritage and Islam existing side by side. It could be noted, for instance, that whereas in strongly traditional Islamic Saudi Arabia women are prohibited from driving a car, the same is allowed in the Islamic Republic of Iran. These differences have nothing to do with Islam itself, but rather with different cultures existing in these countries.

Similarly, the harsh treatment of women by the Taliban in Afghanistan is much more a reflection of regional tribal customs and attitudes than a part of Islam. Throwing acid in women’s faces happens in wider parts of Asia, including India and Cambodia, and can be seen as purely criminal. Other examples are female circumcision, most widely spread in Africa, and so-called “honour” killings.

But this does not prevent larger parts of the non-Muslim world from perceiving these attitudes as connected with Islam, which therefore generally has a non-favourable effect on the attitude towards Islam in the West.

Both Muslim and non-Muslim scholars have a common responsibility not only to explain relevant issues about Islam, but also to make clear what is not related to Islam, but rather to other factors, such as politics, culture and local traditions. In doing so, academics not only contribute to bridging misunderstandings but also correct inaccurate perceptions.

When exchanging views within the framework of an intercultural, or interfaith dialogue, we do not necessarily have to discuss religious issues as such. After all, it is common for most believers to consider their own beliefs to be the best and most correct. What is more important is to discuss underlying values and beliefs that the various parties may have in common.

  • Dr. Nikolaos van Dam is the Netherlands Ambassador to Jakarta. This article is part of a lecture, “The Global Political Trend and the Role of Islam: the Academic Responsibility of Muslim Scholars” delivered at the Institute of Koranic Studies in Jakarta on 29 April 2009…. The full text can be found at www.nikolaosvandam.com
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink. Trackbacks are closed, but you can post a comment.

6 Comments

  1. Posted May 27, 2009 at 2:12 PM | Permalink

    All true.

    But if we say that the bad things that are done in the name of Islam are cultural rather than ‘Islamic’ does that not also mean that the same should necessarily apply in reverse?

    I.e. Should we also recognise that good things associated with Islam (i.e. hospitality in the Arab world) are not necessarily ‘Islamic’ but are rather cultural?

  2. Posted May 27, 2009 at 3:09 PM | Permalink

    Homosexuality is legal in Indonesia but as far as we know, “there are no gay people in Iran”. Saudi Arabia punishes thieves by amputating their limbs but Pakistanis and Bangladeshis reward them by making them their political leaders.

  3. Kiwi
    Posted May 28, 2009 at 5:39 AM | Permalink

    Shame Dr. van Dam has not read the ‘Reliance of the Traveller’ where section e4.3 states that circumcision for females is obligatory although the Hanbali schools holds that it is not obligitory but sunna, and the Hanafi school condsider it a mere courtesy to the husband.

    I can’t see that as being ‘cultural’!

  4. Ibn Khaldun
    Posted May 28, 2009 at 9:07 AM | Permalink

    Is that true? Do scholars even discuss FGM?

  5. Houriya
    Posted May 28, 2009 at 5:52 PM | Permalink

    @ Inspector Gadget – Yes I agree with you. There is nothing wrong in adopting cultural aspects that are good.

    @ Kiwi – what are you on about?

    @ Ibn Khaldun – Didn’t ‘Sheikh’ Qaradawi say that one of the forms of FGM is permissible? (bearing in mind that ALL forms of female genital are mutilation, not circumcision)

  6. Kiwi
    Posted May 29, 2009 at 3:35 AM | Permalink

    Apologies Houriya – I was referring to para. 11 which mentioned the harsh treatment of women by the Taliban and whilst many of these are regional tribal customs, some (acid throwing, honour killings) are criminal.
    The last sentence of the paragraph reads ‘Other examples are female circumcision, most widely spread in Africa, and honour killings’.

    But circumcision is legal under Islamic law therefore it is neither criminal or cultural – it is legal and mandatory for muslim women of the proscribed schools. Van Dam, by tacking this sentence at the end of a paragraph discussing tribal cultures and criminal offences obfuscates to make it seem that female circumcision is not part of Islam.

    As I said before, it can be found in The Reliance of the Traveller -A Classic Manual of Islamic Law published in 1994 and accredited by Al-Azhar. Surely if van Dam were going to write about ‘ What is and isn’t Islam’ he should have checked Sharia lawbooks and presented female circumcision as it is written in Islamic law – not just as a sentence which is ambiguous and looks as if it has just been tacked onto the end of a paragraph as an afterthought and in an effort to make it seem as if it may be cultural or criminal.

    He has treated ‘honour killings’ in the same way, trying to make it look as if this is a crime under Islamic law. Of course, under Islamic law there is no retribution against parents or the parents parents for killing their children/grandchildren.

    Interesting article, yes, but more for its ambiguity than its truth, which he tries to gloss over for obvious reasons.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Subscribe without commenting