IW Gets a Well Deserved Kick in the Pants

Bob Pitt is the far-Left blogger who furiously documents any criticism of Islamism on “Islam0phobia-Watch”. Pitt publishes his anti-Muslim/pro-Islamist screed under the nom de guerre of Martin Sullivan.

Pitt/Sullivan published this childish rant in response to Gita Sahgal lambasting of Amnesty and Moazzam Begg:

Gita Sahgal is a member of a nutty group called Women Against Fundamentalisms. In a 2006 radio programme she defended the view that by consulting the Muslim Council of Britain the government was encouraging fundamentalism.

Stroppyblog fillets this defamatory nonsense and hangs poor Pitt up to dry:

Yeah, listen to the male community leaders instead boys, rather than women who have fought in their respective religious communities for the rights of women. A group who campaigned alongside Southall Black Sisters , stood up to men who shouted them down when they dared speak out against censorship, who screamed at them on demos saying they should be at home when they dared speak out about the Fatwa on Rushdie.

Shame IW had to stoop to the level of insults such as cranks and nutty, used by men to dismiss women who are a bit uppity . Hey boys, why not go the whole misogynistic hog and ask if she has PMT.

Still I’m sure that has put Gita and the girls in their place, hope they sit down and shut up , else they will be called Islamaphobic. That should silence debate as usual.

Ouch!

A message to silly Mr Pitt: If you’re going to trade in misogynistic, racist, sexist, Islamist drivel be prepared to take some flack once in a while.

This entry was posted in Islamism, The Far Left. Bookmark the permalink. Trackbacks are closed, but you can post a comment.

11 Comments

  1. Abu Wannabe Arab
    Posted February 9, 2010 at 9:20 AM | Permalink

    Bob – why don’t you change the title of your website to ‘I am thick and can’t distinguish between extremists and regular Muslims and will attack anyone who criticizes extremists and label them Islamophobic even if they are Muslim watch’. Actually that’s a bit long. Either way as a Muslim I find your site insulting, patronising and greasy.

  2. Posted February 9, 2010 at 12:13 PM | Permalink

    Bob Pitt eviscerated by angry women.

    All my dreams come true.

  3. abdullah
    Posted February 9, 2010 at 12:37 PM | Permalink

    Bob Pitt is a hero. IW details hatred against all Muslims not just “Islamists” as this article lyingly claims. Its clear the person who wrote this article hasnt actually seen the IW site

    Take a look at these recent posts

    Anti-Muslim racists arrested in Wales
    “Five men have been arrested after a Facebook site was set up declaring “all Muslims should be thrown out of Wales”.”

    http://www.islamophobia-watch.com/islamophobia-watch/2010/2/8/anti-muslim-racists-arrested-in-wales.html

    Attacks on City University Muslim students will not result in prosecutions
    http://www.islamophobia-watch.com/islamophobia-watch/2010/2/8/attacks-on-city-university-muslim-students-will-not-result-i.html

    Only a Muslim hater would disgree with IW noble work in highlighting such crimes. Step forward Spitoon

    In any case many bigots hide their hatred of Muslims behind a “we only hate “Islamists” line”. Given that Shitoon has a section (its largest) on “Anti-Muslim bigotry” its laughably hypocritical for it to attack IW for doing the same thing. But given that Spitoon links to anti-Muslim hate sites what do you expect ?

  4. Posted February 10, 2010 at 9:41 AM | Permalink

    It is wholly ethical to protest anti-Muslim bigotry. Unfortunately Pitt is more interested in lazily blurring the lines between Islam and Islamism and championing hardcore Islamists whilst demonising Muslims who stand against clerical fascism and jihadists.

    The people who insist there is no difference between Islamists and the Muslim mainstream are either propagandists from the far-right (EDL, BNP etc), the far-left (SWP) and Islamist of the Jamaat/MB sort.

  5. Posted February 10, 2010 at 10:03 AM | Permalink

    Abdullah

    I see, as usual, that you do not want to address the content of this thread.

    Bob Pitt’s comments were sleazy, wrong and unacceptable. Do you agree or not?

  6. Posted February 10, 2010 at 11:45 AM | Permalink

    anyone else think abdullah is our old friend munir/blah/me back again with yet another alias, after he’s been told that he’s not welcome?

    methinks the usual themes, spelling and lunacy are emerging.

    b’shalom

    bananabrain

  7. dawood
    Posted February 10, 2010 at 11:48 AM | Permalink

    Munir was a lot sharper but angrier, possibly fuelled on meta-amphetamines and meths.

    abdullah is just thick or at least as clever as Bob of Pitt.

  8. Posted February 10, 2010 at 12:15 PM | Permalink

    Abdullah

    I am waiting for you to explain to us all how Bob Pitt was correct to attack Gita Sahgal in the manner in which he did. If you do not agree with Pitt’s attack, then explain why.

    Either way it would be very nice if you might address the article, rather than using yet another thread on Spittoon to launch into one of your off-topic, bizarre, rambling assaults on anti-Islamism.

    For what it is worth, I believe Abdullah may be one of the MPACuk forum regulars, actually. Speculation based on the sheer asinine stupidity of his comments and his consistent inability to comprehend even the simplest comments made by anyone else – common MPAC-er failings.

  9. Abu Wannabe Arab
    Posted February 10, 2010 at 4:36 PM | Permalink

    He is about as thick as your average Mpac-er.

  10. dawood
    Posted February 10, 2010 at 5:19 PM | Permalink

    Bob Pitt is a racist. He hates brown people who don’t hate white people.

  11. Posted February 10, 2010 at 5:45 PM | Permalink

    I’m still waiting, Abdullah.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Subscribe without commenting