If anyone criticises Islamists then you call them anti-Muslim and dismiss them completely. Any publication or website which carries anti-Islamist articles is of course Islamophobic. This means you don’t have to worry about looking at the facts. Easy isn’t it.

The educational system in Tower Hamlets is not what it used to be.

How about addressing the content of my article to which you are so strangely obsessed?

Perhaps you could get someone to read it to you and explain the big words, if that helps?

You are pure comedy gold, darlink.

Think this thread has a new title.

Something like:

“Whoops, I’ve done it again! More D’oh-isms from Abdullah”, perhaps?

I have based no other story on the same source, Abdullah. You need to check your facts, beloved.

You are such a great advertisement for the anti-Islamist cause.

A real treasure.

How you prove my points for me!

Who in their right mind is going to engage with rabid Muslim hating sites such as Front Page which YOU Abu Faris linked to and based stories on ?

And then:

Says the man who thinks Front Page magazine is a valid source for news about Muslims. LOL.

Rather proves my point for me, Abdullah.

Quod erat demonstrandum

That’s Latin, you know.

Yep, supporting the MCB/Jamaat nexus is pro-genocidalist, anti-Bengali and anti-Muslim. Even by the low standards set by the likes of yourself.

Think this thread has a new title.

Faisal Gazi and “racism”

You need a compass. The road to Jamaate-Islam is splattered with the blood of Muslims.

What I find especially amusing, Abdullah, is your consistent critique directed at the source of any report carried here – combined with your complete refusal to engage with its content.

Who in their right mind is going to engage with rabid Muslim hating sites such as Front Page which YOU Abu Faris linked to and based stories on ?

This reaches its nadir over on Michael Ezra’s thread, where you complain that Michael’s sources are “Zionists” (code, as we all know, for Jewish) without a shred of evidence; and simultaneously fail to challenge a single one of Michael’s theses.

Says the man who thinks Front Page magazine is a valid source for news about Muslims. LOL.

Abdullah,

If you think this is a blog for right-wing anti-Muslim loonies, would you not be better off making your points on a blog for right-wing Islamist loonies?

You should feel right at home on somewhere like MPACuk – they have poor English comprehension skills and cannot achieve joined-up thinking either.

Nice try at silencing those who disagree with you. Id rather stand up to anti-Muslim bigots like the people on this site than run off to a Muslim-only site.

This reaches its nadir over on Michael Ezra’s thread, where you complain that Michael’s sources are “Zionists” (code, as we all know, for Jewish) without a shred of evidence; and simultaneously fail to challenge a single one of Michael’s theses.

This is fallacious reasoning, Abdullah – if “reasoning” is not too charitable a term for the extended ad homina in which you ceaselessly engage to cover up for your supreme ignorance about much of what you write.

If you think this is a blog for right-wing anti-Muslim loonies, would you not be better off making your points on a blog for right-wing Islamist loonies?

You should feel right at home on somewhere like MPACuk – they have poor English comprehension skills and cannot achieve joined-up thinking either.

You might want to reflect on the fact that the MCB was created during a Conservative government before you make a complete fool of yourself.

And if they arent very bright why are you bothering arguing against them?

Oh, I wrote that Islamists, in general are not very bright. I did not write that no Islamist is bright. Your comprehension skills are severely lacking today, Abdullah.

I argue against you because watching you tie yourself up into knots is actually vaguely amusing and rather proves my point about most Islamists not being very bright (re, yourt comment about Bari, above – which is, I agree with Faisal, utterly hilarious).

I argue against a pernicious clerical fascist ideology (Islamism), promoted by some rather bright yet evil individuals, and conducted by dullards (such as yourself) who are either not so bright or too lazy to think for themselves.

I do hope that is clear enough for you.

Abdullah

You are living proof that Islamists are, in general, not very bright.

Abu Faris thanks for proving my earlier point:

Given the amount of similiar name-calling of opponents Spitoon indulges in, this post is laughably hypocritical.

And if they arent very bright why are you bothering arguing against them ?