<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Index On Self-Censorship?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spittoon.org/archives/4247/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spittoon.org/archives/4247</link>
	<description>Heresy is another word for freedom of thought</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 22:24:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: dawood</title>
		<link>http://www.spittoon.org/archives/4247#comment-14854</link>
		<dc:creator>dawood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 17:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spittoon.org/?p=4247#comment-14854</guid>
		<description>Yes, by playing on fears that the publication of the cartoons will provoke violent reactions against the IoC is highly offensive and essentialist assumption in the first place. I doubt if Bunglawala and the anti-Muslim bigots at Islamophobia-Watch will recognise this for what it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, by playing on fears that the publication of the cartoons will provoke violent reactions against the IoC is highly offensive and essentialist assumption in the first place. I doubt if Bunglawala and the anti-Muslim bigots at Islamophobia-Watch will recognise this for what it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Great Satan</title>
		<link>http://www.spittoon.org/archives/4247#comment-14839</link>
		<dc:creator>The Great Satan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 14:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spittoon.org/?p=4247#comment-14839</guid>
		<description>&quot;to summarise our common view: re-publication of the cartoons would put at risk the security of our staff and others&quot; 

wow - IoC have quite a low opinion of British Muslims!  SInce the protests that al Muhajirioun organised (months after the original publication of the cartoons), people just assume that it will happen again.  although there is no evidence to suggest that.

Good on Glanville and Malik at least!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;to summarise our common view: re-publication of the cartoons would put at risk the security of our staff and others&#8221; </p>
<p>wow &#8211; IoC have quite a low opinion of British Muslims!  SInce the protests that al Muhajirioun organised (months after the original publication of the cartoons), people just assume that it will happen again.  although there is no evidence to suggest that.</p>
<p>Good on Glanville and Malik at least!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abu Faris</title>
		<link>http://www.spittoon.org/archives/4247#comment-14825</link>
		<dc:creator>Abu Faris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 06:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spittoon.org/?p=4247#comment-14825</guid>
		<description>This is ridiculous and shame-making. 

It will also put IoC in a rather embarrassing situation next one of the Arab world&#039;s increasingly brave bloggers puts up the Muhammad cartoons on a website. Exactly how do Index intend to support such people&#039;s right to free expression in the light of this decision?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is ridiculous and shame-making. </p>
<p>It will also put IoC in a rather embarrassing situation next one of the Arab world&#8217;s increasingly brave bloggers puts up the Muhammad cartoons on a website. Exactly how do Index intend to support such people&#8217;s right to free expression in the light of this decision?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
