You have shown no evidence what so ever that HT has recieved government money, directly or indirectly.

You are cowards, who sit anonymously behind a PC and spread lies to please the followers of Shaitaan.

Shame on you all.

its funny how the words “kill a jew where you find one” is highlighted

why’s it funny? are you suggesting that particular bit is in some way unimportant or incidental?

Have you read the Talmud! talk about hatred!

i study talmud every day. do you? or are you simply regurgitating the poisonous propaganda found on white supremacist websites regarding it?

come on, let’s have a specific accusation, then i can show you up to be the racist you are.

b’shalom

bananabrain

t is rich of Mr Cameron, who supported the war that has killed more than 650,000 civilians in Iraq, as well as backing the Israeli bombardment of Lebanon last summer, to lecture others on the sanctity of life.

Cameron has selectively misquoted a phrase from a leaflet that was written in Palestine, for Palestine and in the context of the massacre in Jenin. However, there are other problems – outside of culture, language and religion – in the context of the on-going occupation of Palestine, that confuse the matter further, which allow people such as David Cameron to make false accusations of anti-semitism to silence criticisms of Israel.

Islam’s history in the region – and what Hizb ut-Tahrir argues for as a model of governance in the Muslim world – has an excellent and proud track record of unifying diverse people as citizens. Jews, Muslims and Christians lived largely in peace and security for much of the last 14 centuries in Palestine, in Islamic Spain and under the Ottoman Caliphate.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2007/jul/09/whatcamerongotwrong

I would agree.

Looking at the Key Stage 1 and Key Stage 2 Curriculum, the following subjects would require either dramatic adjustments to their content, or complete exclusion by a school dedicated to promoting HT’s dismal and grim Islamism:

Literacy – the renewed framework’s requirements would require adjustment to probably exclude all poetry units and all use of drama.

Science – exclusion of units of work concerning life processes, especially reproduction, adaptation and other evolutionary processes.

Music – Oh deary no!

RE – replace entirely with Islamiyat (of an Islamist bent, of course) – no discussion of other faiths (except in a negative manner); certainly no visits to other faith places of worship.

PE – segregate all lessons by gender and remove entirely dance units of work.

Art – probably would have to entirely go…

Humanities – reduced to a discussion of the history and geography of the Caliphate (from an HT perspective); thus all units of work in the present Schemes of Work would have to be cut or drastically edited in order to match objectives to new teaching activities.

Modern Foreign Languages – none – the Arabic being taught is Qur’anic, not Modern Standard Arabic. A pity – there is a very good MSA program of study available that can be matched to the objectives of the KS2 MFL scheme of work.

Design Technology – possibly uncontroversial – although doubtless HT will object to certain sections in KS1 scheme of work that involve making (figurative) finger puppets…

PHSE/Citizenship – Of course not! This is an evil kufur country, run on the basis of a permissive, democratic Satanic constitution – what are you thinking of?!?!?!

Such a “school” is not the sort of place I would send my little ones.

What is wrong with OFSTED?

My earlier comment was confusing. I wrote:

The ISF School was first inspected in 2005, with the report being published in 2006. Supposedly when initial inspections were not published due to a settling-in of new schools.

This should read:

The ISF School in Slough was first inspected in 2005, with the report being published in 2006. Supposedly when initial inspections were not published due to a settling-in of new schools.

The point being that if school’s initial reports in 2007/8 academic year were not published if they were new schools, then how was an initial report for 2005/6 published for the then new school in Slough?

Further, reporting regulations were not altered (as far as I am aware, having been involved in such matters) between 2005/6 and 2006/7.

As such, if Balls was correct, the Slough report should also not have been published by OFSTED for similar reasons; but it was.

Because Islamia is a Muslim school, nothing to do with Hizb-ut-Tahrir specifically, and it’s curriculum is in line with the National Curriculum under which all religious schools operate. If you are saying you want to ban Muslim schools then you need to answer the question why only Muslim schools and not all other religious schools. Because that would *really* be petty and hypocritical.

1) HT advocates the killing of Jews. CSC does not favour the murder of any religious group.
2) You have to be a Muslim to be a member of HT. There is no such racial or political constraint in CSC.
3) CSC says that no one religion should be made superior over others nor granted special privileges, distinctions or supra-constitutional powers. HT says that their ideology of political Islam should be the granted supreme privileges and powers over all religions which they regard as false religions.
4) HT is a religio-political, fascist, totalitarian ideological political party with a party constitution to which all its members must adhere to. CSC is a think tank in a small group of people in which a diverse political outlooks work in.
5) HT is banned in a number of Muslim countries because of it’s religious supremacism. CSC is not banned anywhere and would be welcome in many Muslim countries.

http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/news/content.cfm?landing=ed_balls_responds_to_michael_gove_regarding_the_islamic_shakhsiyah_foundation_schools_in_slough_and_haringey&type=1

you [Michael Gove} question whether the Haringey School has ever been inspected. In fact it has been inspected in 2007 and had a follow-up monitoring visit in 2008. The next inspection of the school is due in 2010.

To confirm, this is in error. The ISF school in Slough was inspected by OFSTED in 2005 and again in 2009. There is no record of the Haringey school having ever been inspected. All published OFSTED reports are reported (in full) on this site:

http://www.ofsted.gov.uk

No OFSTED reports have been filed on this site for the school in Haringey.

Here is, however, the link for the report on the ISF school in Slough:

http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/oxedu_providers/full/%28urn%29/134085/%28type%29/16384,32768/%28typename%29/Independent%20education

Balls attempts an evasion:

The inspection reports relating to the Haringey school are not in the public domain as the 2007 inspection and follow up visit in 2008 were the school’s first inspection since registration and practice at the time was for reports not to be published until the schools were well established. Similarly, reports of emergency inspections are not routinely published so the 2007 inspection report of the Slough school has not been published. However, I am happy to make these available to you and they are attached to this letter.

This is mistaken. The ISF School was first inspected in 2005, with the report being published in 2006. Supposedly when initial inspections were not published due to a settling-in of new schools.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/muslim-schools-win-historic-fight-for-state-funding-1137679.html

and certain elements in the U.S. govt. do think he is also an extremist (due to past statements and actions) which is why he was denied entry to the U.S.:

http://www.debbieschlussel.com/2759/no-peace-train-why-is-america-embracing-extremist-yusuf-islam-cat-stevens/

I may not be a fan of HT but if you support action against one and not the other, it looks pretty petty and hypocritical.

The Hizb-ut-Tahrir is funded by the government and gets to preach it’s ideology in schools funded by Slough and Haringey Councils.

“Conditions for Muslims in Europe must be made harder across the board: Europe must look like a less attractive proposition. We in Europe owe—after all—no special dues to Islam. We owe them no religious holidays, special rights or privileges. ”

What, pray tell, is the difference between this outfit and Hizb-ut-Tahrir?