It’s the Israelis Wot Killed Jacko

After pondering the question of whether Michael Jackson would receive an Islamic funeral, MPACUK now reports that an Israeli drugs company was linked to his death. Their title is pretty clear (Israeli Company Linked To Michael Jackson’s Death) but the facts are much less so.

An Israeli pharmaceutical company has recalled two batches of an anesthetic drug connected to the investigation of Michael Jackson’s death.

The anesthetic was found in Jackson’s home following his death last month, the Associated Press reported.

Teva Pharmaceuticals recalled two lots of propofol after 40 people in three states got sick from bacterial contamination. A Teva spokeswoman told the news service that the tracking number on the tainted lots was different from the number on the vial found at Jackson’s home.

The drug is normally used in hospitals to render patients unconscious during surgery. Investigators are seeking to trace how the drug came into Jackson’s possession.

Oh right, no Israeli conspiracy then

This entry was posted in Islamism, Israel/Palestine and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink. Trackbacks are closed, but you can post a comment.

41 Comments

  1. Raziq
    Posted July 21, 2009 at 10:23 AM | Permalink

    Standards have really slipped at MPACUK.

  2. Koppers
    Posted July 21, 2009 at 10:26 AM | Permalink

    Standards have really slipped at MPACUK.

    Everything is a “Zionist” conspiracy at MPACUK. Bukhari is such a prat.

  3. Israelinurse
    Posted July 21, 2009 at 10:49 AM | Permalink

    If only the MPACUK guys would start cleaning their teeth with hummus, they too could dominate the world!

  4. Posted July 21, 2009 at 2:28 PM | Permalink

    Well posted.

  5. Joe Camel
    Posted July 21, 2009 at 3:23 PM | Permalink

    The computers at Neverland are being examined to determine whether they were running on Israeli-developed software.

    Suggestions that MPACUK’s computers also run on Israeli-developed software are nothing but malicious slander. MPACUK, of course, would never allow Israeli programs anywhere near its computers, which run, instead, on software developed in the Zionist Entity.

  6. Posted July 21, 2009 at 4:59 PM | Permalink

    I think this comes from Dieudonné:
    http://www.lesogres.info/article.php3?id_article=4381

  7. vildechaye
    Posted July 21, 2009 at 11:15 PM | Permalink

    The Israelis ate my baby.

  8. Posted July 22, 2009 at 11:48 AM | Permalink

    The Israelis ate my baby.

    Quick, you’d better report that to MPACUK.

  9. Posted July 22, 2009 at 12:13 PM | Permalink

    Please feel free to share the following comments to all your colleagues:
    It is with deep regret that I will no longer be using your blog for comments of any kind and have further distanced myself from posting any additional threads.

    I believe your site is fast becoming an environment to promote erroneous & indiscriminate hostilities against all people. It is evident that many of the comments on some of the post threads are fuelled by nothing but pure race hatred or religious hatred instead of intriguing, intellectual debate to stimulate the senses. It is clear that there is an elite group of users at the top of your establishment that come together and pounce on any viewer that posts something that promotes views other than your own. On one front you promote freedom of speech and on another you thrust you’re lance against the chest of one partaking in healthy debate and discussion and when you get bored with them, you simply delete their comments to further replace them with more self imposed beliefs. The mockery and persecution of some viewers is like watching a deluge of message being posted from children in kindergarten; ‘Your mum is this . . . ‘ or ‘you’re dad is that . . . ‘ or ‘you need to spend time fraternizing with more women and kiss them’ etc.
    On one front Islamic, on anotherAnti-Islamic, whats the story – you decide, before its too late and you incur 0 hits on a daily basis!!

  10. Joe Camel
    Posted July 22, 2009 at 1:27 PM | Permalink

    Guys, may i bring to your attention the latest ‘Anti-Spittoon’ article at http://intellectualmuslim.blogspot.com – quite an interesting read, have to agree with some comments and disagree with others but agree on most things.

  11. Posted July 22, 2009 at 2:25 PM | Permalink

    Fair comment. Everyone’s entitled to their own opinion.

  12. Seerat
    Posted July 22, 2009 at 2:49 PM | Permalink

    @ Faisal – You are right, everyone is entitled to their opinions.

    @ Stinger – freedom of speech also means freedom to cause offence, whether one likes it or not. We live in a society where peoples sensibilities are ridiculed all the time – and they need to get over it. We can either choose to respond in exactly the same manner, differently, or ignore.

  13. Posted July 22, 2009 at 2:59 PM | Permalink

    Freedom of Speech is an Anti-Islamic notion, that each individual needs to curb, unless he is looking forward to being held accountable on yawm-ul-qiyaamah

  14. Posted July 22, 2009 at 3:08 PM | Permalink

    Well stinger, homophobia and antisemitism are both anti-social notions. But British society has learnt to accomodate some Muslims having and making these opinions known because of the principle of “Freedom of Speech”. Which is why Britain is one of best countries in the world to be a practising Muslim.

  15. Koppers
    Posted July 22, 2009 at 3:23 PM | Permalink

    Guys, may i bring to your attention the latest ‘Anti-Spittoon’ article at http://intellectualmuslim.blogspot.com – quite an interesting read, have to agree with some comments and disagree with others but agree on most things.

    Are you serious? He/She thinks the authors of this blog are Jews masquerading as Muslims.

  16. The Common Humanist
    Posted July 22, 2009 at 3:26 PM | Permalink

    This, I think, is a revealing comment from IM:

    “Similarly, there tends to be a lot of support towards removing the Burqa, giving Muslim women the right to choose to wear the veil or not”

    The Islamist mindset laid bear – or bare even – no free choices for women, not now, not ever. The desire of Islamist men to control women is repugnant and brings shame on the religion of Islam. Gender power politics – the control and oppression of women – dressed up as religion – is crippling the muslim world. It has now been exported into the West – thanks for that.

  17. Posted July 22, 2009 at 3:29 PM | Permalink

    yeah right, and how does britain accomodate the homophobic and anti-semetic – by persecuting them through anti-terrorism legislation?
    Freedom of speech is just a meaningless concept to keep happy those slaves that don’t question the hegemonistic ideals of those slave drivers that continue to exploit at the top of the foodchain.
    Take the example of the dutch cartoonists, taking the side of freedom of speech, they should have been crucified for insulting the prophet and ridiculing Islam, but they were’nt because of this so called satanic frredom of speech malarky. Even British Muslims, mainly Wuslims (mostly from the likes of quilliam and this site) that have a habit of ‘blowing’ imperial sausages didnt condemn with their words the evils that had taken place). This is what freedom of speech does, it takes ur manhood and throws it out of the window, and ur forced to live alongside a flock of mentally suppressed and sad people that think they have been granted freedom.

  18. Abu Yusuf
    Posted July 22, 2009 at 3:37 PM | Permalink

    Guys, may i bring to your attention the latest ‘Anti-Spittoon’ article at http://intellectualmuslim.blogspot.com – quite an interesting read, have to agree with some comments and disagree with others but agree on most things.

    I have posted some comments on their site.

  19. The Common Humanist
    Posted July 22, 2009 at 3:37 PM | Permalink

    stinger
    That is drivel and you know it.

    Freedom of speech, thought, assembly, religion and conscience are the corner stones of any civilised society.

    if you don’t like that I suggest you move to Saudi or Iran where the govt will make all those pesky decisions about what to see, watch and think for you.

  20. Posted July 22, 2009 at 3:40 PM | Permalink

    “Freedom of Speech is an Anti-Islamic notion,”

    Anyone really interested in the whole Freedom of Speech debate would do well not to mischaracterize it, but look at 1950s America McCarthyism (only certain views are permitted, etc), the struggle for civil rights and the violence used against them and then the rule of Richard Nixon.

    That would provide a better understanding of the issue.

    As far as I can see there was NOTHING to do with “Anti-Islamic notions”, during that period when much of our modern understanding and appreciation of freedom of speech comes from.

  21. Posted July 22, 2009 at 3:43 PM | Permalink

    Thanks for those comments on the IM blog, Abu Yusuf.

    It looks like both you and Sister Rasheeda Bilaal have distanced yourselves from IM’s use of your comments to write a poison piece against the Spittoon.

    Thank you both.

  22. The Common Humanist
    Posted July 22, 2009 at 3:44 PM | Permalink

    Stinger
    Furthermore, after nigh on a thousand years of relative parity, it is those things that you so despise that enabled Christendom to accelerate past and then lap many times the Islamic World in terms of science, industry and social progress. Indeed in many ways it was the swapping of those values between East and West in the Middle Ages caused by cultural transmission of ideas via Al Andalus, the Crusades, the Eastern Roman Empire and the Ottoman foraysinto Europe that caused the West to surpass the near east. During the Middle Ages the West become progressively more open minded, the East less so. Perhaps the end of the golden age of Islamic culture began with the destruction of wonderful Old Bagdhad by the Mongols as is suggested by some scholars. Anyways, the Islamic world would do well to look back at its classical period for inspiration (the science, the art) rather then the sterile grubbiness of the 18th Century Wahhabists, for example.

  23. Posted July 22, 2009 at 3:50 PM | Permalink

    Take the example of the dutch cartoonists, taking the side of freedom of speech, they should have been crucified for insulting the prophet and ridiculing Islam, but they were’nt because of this so called satanic frredom of speech malarky.

    Well, to placate muslims like yourself, the government passed the Racial and Religious Hatred Act 2006, strongly lobbied by the MCB, to protect you and yours from further offence and reduce Freedom of Speech when it comes to religious sentiments.

    But you can’t have it both ways. You can’t have laws to protect religions from FoS and then feel persecuted and victimised when you’re pulled up on rampant and shameless homophobia and antisemitism.

  24. Posted July 22, 2009 at 4:43 PM | Permalink

    the comments thread just continues on the IM Blog, Abu-Yusuf why did you get them to remove that comment?

  25. Posted July 22, 2009 at 4:52 PM | Permalink

    The Common Humanist

    You’d do well to research Islamic History too, maybe you’ll be insprired to either say ur shahadah for the first time or renew it for old times sake.

    xx

  26. Posted July 22, 2009 at 4:58 PM | Permalink

    I see the IM crowd have resorted to name-calling since they really don’t have any substantive criticisms of his own other than comments by others he’s cut and pasted. And now the IM guy is abusing the authors of those comments for retracting their use on his blog!

    Classy stuff. Very intellectual muslims.

  27. The Common Humanist
    Posted July 22, 2009 at 5:05 PM | Permalink

    stinger

    Am a student of history, particularly medieval and also a white atheist.

    Cheers

    TCH

  28. Posted July 22, 2009 at 5:13 PM | Permalink

    Faisal, Ilike your display pic, suits you well – cowering in a corner like some scared to death sheep, passing little clever remarks here and there,

    and

    The Common Humanist – Whatever you are, you should consider saying the shahadah and become a Muslim, join us and we can fill in the rather large gaps of history that exist with the bodies of those that choose to mock us (if you catch my drift)

  29. Posted July 22, 2009 at 5:18 PM | Permalink

    Faisal – they’ve included you on a comment on the IM blog, they’ve made use of my comments this time

  30. vildechaye
    Posted July 22, 2009 at 5:37 PM | Permalink

    RE: Freedom of Speech is an Anti-Islamic notion

    If I said that, I’d be called an Islamophobe. Thanks for putting it on the record, stinger.

    And in addition to the anti-democratic credentials you’ve just provided, you’re also an idiot. You would have to look long and hard to find a single blog that doesn’t include poorly thought out hurried invective masquerading as opinion. To single out Spittoon for this indicates clearly that you simply take issue with the opinions expressed…. welcome to the world, buddy, i take issue with most of the opinions i read on blogs, but i don’t have the temerity or hubris to actually think God/Allah whatever actually shares my opinion.
    Assuming you’re really outta here (which I doubt), good riddance.

  31. Posted July 22, 2009 at 5:39 PM | Permalink

    vildechaye

    I’m not going anywhere G, bring it on!

  32. Posted July 22, 2009 at 5:56 PM | Permalink

    stinger,

    I am curious, why do *you* think that anti-Jewish conspiracy theories seem to circulate on MPACUK?

  33. Koppers
    Posted July 22, 2009 at 7:42 PM | Permalink

    Take the example of the dutch cartoonists, taking the side of freedom of speech, they should have been crucified for insulting the prophet and ridiculing Islam

    That speaks volumes about your lack of faith. Anyone who can’t take criticism, or even mocking, of their religion is patently totally insecure in their beliefs. Take the mickey out of Christianity, Judaism, secularism, Buddhism etc all you want – not one of those groups will give a fig.

  34. Posted July 22, 2009 at 8:37 PM | Permalink

    you’ll want to take back your words once you’re caught up in the crucifixions

  35. vildechaye
    Posted July 22, 2009 at 9:47 PM | Permalink

    RE: This is what freedom of speech does, it takes ur manhood and throws it out of the window, and ur forced to live alongside a flock of mentally suppressed and sad people that think they have been granted freedom.

    Yeah, go after the “manhood” of men who live in countries with freedom of speech. Meanwhile, Islamic “manhood” is so impressive a few hundred thousand Israeli soldiers have been able to kick Arab ass at will for 60 years and many more to come.

    In fact, the problems in your society spring from your twisted concepts of “manhood,” where you only see men in the streets shouting allahu akhbar and there is no female input, leading to the idiotic displays like shooting guns in the air and useless male posturing about any issue, including muslim victimization. How manly is that? You’re a friggin joke.

  36. Posted July 22, 2009 at 10:45 PM | Permalink

    shikwa keeping out of it all, coward, should adopt Faisal’s display pic

    In the face of the bravery and courage of IntellectualMuslims, probably wise.

  37. bananabrain
    Posted July 23, 2009 at 10:03 AM | Permalink

    Are you serious? He/She thinks the authors of this blog are Jews masquerading as Muslims.

    i’m not masquerading as a muslim, merely as someone who despite everything, is somewhat of an islamophile. not that that is a masquerade, you understand, i hope. incidentally, i probably count as an apostate because i have been “invited to islam” many times, understand what that means and have, nonetheless, chosen to remain a jew.

    you should consider saying the shahadah and become a Muslim, join us and we can fill in the rather large gaps of history that exist with the bodies of those that choose to mock us (if you catch my drift)

    a little bit darth vader, don’t you think? “together we can rule the galaxy”? it would be funny if it didn’t appear to be an invitation to engage in mass murder: “filling in gaps in history with the bodies of those who mock us”? i think i catch this particular drift and i don’t think i like it at all. i would almost go so far as to say that that was threatening behaviour.

    b’shalom

    bananabrain

  38. The Common Humanist
    Posted July 23, 2009 at 11:42 AM | Permalink

    “”a little bit darth vader, don’t you think? “together we can rule the galaxy”? it would be funny if it didn’t appear to be an invitation to engage in mass murder: “filling in gaps in history with the bodies of those who mock us”? i think i catch this particular drift and i don’t think i like it at all. i would almost go so far as to say that that was threatening behaviour”"

    LoL.

    Stinger

    Are you one of those muslims that think that only muslims can really discuss history that involves islam???

    Thankyou for your kind offer but I shall remain resolutely godless. Good for the soul and clarity of thought, for myself at least.

  39. hobkirk
    Posted July 23, 2009 at 1:17 PM | Permalink

    CHECK ABU-YUSUF OUT ON http://intellectualmuslim.blogspot.com

    Hes pissed off at IM blog and hes bringing on the complaints

  40. dawood
    Posted July 23, 2009 at 1:39 PM | Permalink

    “Intellectual Muslim” is quite possibly the most inappropriate name for a group of regressive, knuckle-dragging, inbred fascists I have ever seen. The author, who is clearly as thick as a plank, couldn’t string a coherent sentence together to save his life. He relies on other commentators and a febrile paranoia to fire his opinions. And he is egged on by a baying mob of weird and malevolent cretins. It is, in short, an internet-based Hizbut Tahrir freakshow.

  41. hobkirk
    Posted July 23, 2009 at 5:07 PM | Permalink

    dawood – yo mama

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Subscribe without commenting