<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Civil Service has lost the plot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spittoon.org/archives/1550/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spittoon.org/archives/1550</link>
	<description>Heresy is another word for freedom of thought</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:32:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://www.spittoon.org/archives/1550#comment-9730</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 16:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spittoon.org/?p=1550#comment-9730</guid>
		<description>So the question remains, who thought that perfectly ordinary expression of disgust was worth tracking down and reporting?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the question remains, who thought that perfectly ordinary expression of disgust was worth tracking down and reporting?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shikwa</title>
		<link>http://www.spittoon.org/archives/1550#comment-9713</link>
		<dc:creator>Shikwa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spittoon.org/?p=1550#comment-9713</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t have any control over Harry&#039;s Place, but will forward your request to them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have any control over Harry&#8217;s Place, but will forward your request to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Etienne Pollard</title>
		<link>http://www.spittoon.org/archives/1550#comment-9711</link>
		<dc:creator>Etienne Pollard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spittoon.org/?p=1550#comment-9711</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the update, I appreciate the speed with which you corrected the article on this website.  Could you add a similar correction to the article that was published in your name on Harry&#039;s Place, which was uncorrected when I wrote this comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the update, I appreciate the speed with which you corrected the article on this website.  Could you add a similar correction to the article that was published in your name on Harry&#8217;s Place, which was uncorrected when I wrote this comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shikwa</title>
		<link>http://www.spittoon.org/archives/1550#comment-9708</link>
		<dc:creator>Shikwa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 20:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spittoon.org/?p=1550#comment-9708</guid>
		<description>Done!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Done!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Etienne Pollard</title>
		<link>http://www.spittoon.org/archives/1550#comment-9706</link>
		<dc:creator>Etienne Pollard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 19:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spittoon.org/?p=1550#comment-9706</guid>
		<description>The Telegraph story was incorrect, and they have amended the story on their website (the reference to TheyWorkForyou has been removed completely).

Unfortunately quite a few blogs have picked up this story and reported it as fact.  The idea that TheyWorkForYou would report an anonymous commenter to their employer is totally against what we believe in, and harms our reputation as a politically impartial charity who can be trusted with people&#039;s personal data.

We would appreciate it if you would print a prominent correction at the top of this article.  You might like to link to:  http://www.mysociety.org/2009/07/06/theyworkforyou-nothing-to-do-with-this-sacked-civil-servant-story/

Sorry that you got caught up in this unfortunate episode - but please, consider checking out the story next time before republishing!

Thanks

Etienne</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Telegraph story was incorrect, and they have amended the story on their website (the reference to TheyWorkForyou has been removed completely).</p>
<p>Unfortunately quite a few blogs have picked up this story and reported it as fact.  The idea that TheyWorkForYou would report an anonymous commenter to their employer is totally against what we believe in, and harms our reputation as a politically impartial charity who can be trusted with people&#8217;s personal data.</p>
<p>We would appreciate it if you would print a prominent correction at the top of this article.  You might like to link to:  <a href="http://www.mysociety.org/2009/07/06/theyworkforyou-nothing-to-do-with-this-sacked-civil-servant-story/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mysociety.org/2009/07/06/theyworkforyou-nothing-to-do-with-this-sacked-civil-servant-story/</a></p>
<p>Sorry that you got caught up in this unfortunate episode &#8211; but please, consider checking out the story next time before republishing!</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p>Etienne</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shikwa</title>
		<link>http://www.spittoon.org/archives/1550#comment-9704</link>
		<dc:creator>Shikwa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 19:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spittoon.org/?p=1550#comment-9704</guid>
		<description>We&#039;ll obviously amend/correct the story as it develops. But, for now, I&#039;m happy to keep this based on what the Telegraph has reported.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ll obviously amend/correct the story as it develops. But, for now, I&#8217;m happy to keep this based on what the Telegraph has reported.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.spittoon.org/archives/1550#comment-9693</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 15:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spittoon.org/?p=1550#comment-9693</guid>
		<description>The Telegraph appears to have got it wrong.  TheyWorkForYou are denying the existence of any such post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Telegraph appears to have got it wrong.  TheyWorkForYou are denying the existence of any such post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

