The Civil Service has lost the plot

I’m truly lost for words on this one and completely outraged by it, so I’ll keep it short and simple.

The Telegraph is reporting that Lisa Greenwood, an administrator in the Department of Children, Schools and Families, has lost her job for writing an anonymous message on an internet site at the height of the expenses scandal.

After learning that Hazel Blears had allegedly ‘flipped’ her second home to avoid capital gains taxes, Lisa Greenwood wrote:

“How dare you wave a cheque about on national TV, saying that you are sorry.

You are only sorry that you have been caught. You are a disgrace (including all the other honourable members). Why haven’t you been sacked?”

The message was written anonymously on the “They Work for You” website, but was still traced back to her work computer. She was promptly suspended and then sacked.

The Department of Children, Schools and Families said that it sacked her because:

The civil service has a clear code of conduct for its employees, which states that civil servants should be politically impartial and not act in a way that could damage the reputation of their department.

Now, why is this so outrageous you might ask?

Well, just last week we heard that the jihad loving civil servant, Azad Ali, who peddles the worst kind of sectarian and reactionary politics has been reinstated to his post at the Treasury. I wonder how any of these utterances were deemed to be ‘politically impartial’:

Hamas is a true resistance movement that is standing up for the rights of the Palestinians, whereas Fatah and specifically Abu Mazen have capitulated to the colonial mindset.

Or when he called Muslims seeking a ceasefire with Israel during the Gaza War in January:

…nothing but self-serving vultures, feeding on the dead flesh of the Palestinians.

Or this:

So what is the aim of this mass murder? Well it’s ideological. How you may ask? The stated aim of the Zionist terrorist state is to destroy Hamas and what it stands for, i.e. Freedom. You may notice that Fatah are not being targeted nor are they bleeding for the Muslims in Gaza, but hopefully they will once they return to their humanity.

We have seen this before in 2006 when the same Zionist terrorist state attacked Muslims in Lebanon, with the usual amount of fuel being supplied by America and the UK, so let us not be surprised by it – though we should be completely outraged.

There’s many more examples I could give you, but you get the point.

So, on the one hand we have Lisa Greenwood getting sacked for anonymously expressing her outrage over the MP expenses scandal. On the other we have Azad Ali openly glorifying jihad.

Both are Civil Servants governed by the same code of conduct, but only one gets sacked – and it’s not the one lambasting the British state or promoting violence against Israel.

What a disgrace.

UPDATE:

The good people at “They work for you” have written to us (see comments section below) making the point that the Telegraph has now removed all reference to their website in the original story. I’m happy to update the story here too; It seems like the Telegraph reporter named the wrong website.

For the record, they work for you is an excellent website. I use it all the time – although I’ve never left comments on it!

This entry was posted in Anti Fascism, Feature, Islamism, Moral relativism, Politics, UK Politics. Bookmark the permalink. Trackbacks are closed, but you can post a comment.

7 Comments

  1. Adam
    Posted July 6, 2009 at 4:03 PM | Permalink

    The Telegraph appears to have got it wrong. TheyWorkForYou are denying the existence of any such post.

  2. Posted July 6, 2009 at 8:05 PM | Permalink

    We’ll obviously amend/correct the story as it develops. But, for now, I’m happy to keep this based on what the Telegraph has reported.

  3. Posted July 6, 2009 at 8:56 PM | Permalink

    The Telegraph story was incorrect, and they have amended the story on their website (the reference to TheyWorkForyou has been removed completely).

    Unfortunately quite a few blogs have picked up this story and reported it as fact. The idea that TheyWorkForYou would report an anonymous commenter to their employer is totally against what we believe in, and harms our reputation as a politically impartial charity who can be trusted with people’s personal data.

    We would appreciate it if you would print a prominent correction at the top of this article. You might like to link to: http://www.mysociety.org/2009/07/06/theyworkforyou-nothing-to-do-with-this-sacked-civil-servant-story/

    Sorry that you got caught up in this unfortunate episode – but please, consider checking out the story next time before republishing!

    Thanks

    Etienne

  4. Shikwa
    Posted July 6, 2009 at 9:31 PM | Permalink

    Done!

  5. Posted July 6, 2009 at 10:22 PM | Permalink

    Thanks for the update, I appreciate the speed with which you corrected the article on this website. Could you add a similar correction to the article that was published in your name on Harry’s Place, which was uncorrected when I wrote this comment.

  6. Shikwa
    Posted July 6, 2009 at 10:48 PM | Permalink

    I don’t have any control over Harry’s Place, but will forward your request to them.

  7. Don
    Posted July 7, 2009 at 5:50 PM | Permalink

    So the question remains, who thought that perfectly ordinary expression of disgust was worth tracking down and reporting?

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

  • Categories

  • Archives