Further to his increasingly pathetic obsession with anybody who stands against Islamism in the UK, Inayat Bunglawala has launched (via his iEngage group) yet another attack on Quilliam,. This time he is citing a report from the Redbridge Faith Forum.
The already microscopically minuscule credibility of the Quilliam Foundation has suffered yet another hugely embarrassing setback with the publication of a new report from the Redbridge Faith Forum.
The report produced by Redbridge Faith Forum (RFF) for Redbridge Safer Communities Partnership (RSCP), entitled, “Conversations with Muslim Community leaders in Redbridge about the Preventing Violent Extremism (PVE) Agenda”, finds that contrary to the views articulated by the anti-Muslim brigade at Harry’s Place, the QF has no following whatsoever among British Muslims.
According to the RFF report:
‘…negative view[s] towards the Quilliam Foundation [were] held almost universally by all participants and corroborated by attending meetings including Understanding Redbridge Communities (URC) meeting.’
Although Quilliam claim to have no aspirations to being a representative body and gaining mass support, this would still seem to be quite a damning indictment. If they really have “no following whatsoever among British Muslims” then it would appear that their work over the last year and a bit has achieved very little; at least this is the point Bungles wants to make.
Unfortunately for him, the evidence does not support his assertions. He claims the report shows no British Muslim support for Quilliam – but have a look at page six.
Limitations of the study
We were only able to interview 9 Muslim leaders
Given that part of Quilliam’s thesis is that dealing with self-appointed “Muslim leaders”, far from being the solution to the problem of Islamist extremism in the UK, actually contributes to it, it’s not so surprising that these nine “Muslim leaders” are not Quilliam fans.
He also gets a pop in at the Sufi Muslim Council and cites very approvingly one respondent’s views on Bunglawala’s own Muslim Council of Britain.
The Quilliam Foundation is not the only organisation criticised by participants for being out of touch with British Muslims:
“Representative grassroots organisations should be at the forefront of all this (consultative work with the government). The MCB (Muslim Council of Britain) were isolated by the government and the Sufi Council was promoted in their place. But people don’t accept the Sufi Council. The MCB should be representing Muslims nationally. We accept MCB at our Mosque. MCB say Holocaust Day should be for everybody and renamed the International Genocide Day and was disliked for saying this. The MCB does not go against the grain of the community. We work to consensus.”
The identification of many Muslims with the MCB is strongly evinced in the views of respondents. For example:
“As Muslim community leaders, we have to be realistic. We can’t deny true feelings of Muslim community. There has to be a responsibility from central government. Their policy has an impact on the inhabitants. The MP follows the whip’s line. This is dangerous and causes resentment. People will be disenfranchised.”
Bunglawala omits to mention one crucial detail (p14).
[This] was the only specifically mentioned support for the MCB amongst the interview participants
Whoops.
The flakiness of Bunglawala’s argument is extraordinary. Only he could consider nine one-hour long interviews with anonymous “Muslim leaders” representative of all British Muslims, especially when the report itself makes clear that it should not be taken as representative of Redbridge’s Muslims (pp6-7), let alone all the other Muslims in this country.
The views contained in this report do not represent the views of Redbridge Faith Forum, nor the views of the Muslim Community as a whole in Redbridge, but are accurately based on the interviews that were carried out during February and March 2009.
How contemptuous Bungles must be of Britain’s two million Muslims (and how desperate he must be to discredit Quilliam) to draw such wide conclusions from such a limited report, especially against its author’s explicit guidance. And his attempt to bolster the MCB’s exceedingly precarious position through quoting a single unnamed individual smacks of desperation. Risible stuff.
SHIKWA ADDS:
Bunglawala also failed to mention that his wife, Tahmina Saleem, works for Redbridge Council – the very people who conducted this report which her husband then used to attack his enemies. She describes herself as:
the Secretary of Redbridge Forum against Extremism and Islamophobia and currently works with Redbridge Council as a consultant Preventing Violent Extremism (PVE) Project Manager.
I wonder if Redbridge council know what this husband and wife duo are up to?
7 Comments
Haha, good stuff Shikwa. How did I miss that?
Bunga-laden
Five months before the September 11, 2001 attacks, Bunglawala circulated writings of Osama bin Laden, whom he called a “freedom fighter”, to hundreds of Muslims in Britain.[3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inayat_Bunglawala
Bunglawala ‘called the blind Sheikh Omar Abdel-Rahman “courageous”. After Rahman’s arrest on charges of masterminding the bombing of the World Trade Center in New York in July that year, Mr Bunglawala guessed that it was only because of his “calling on Muslims to fulfil their duty to Allah and to fight against oppression and oppressors everywhere”.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inayat_Bunglawala
As editor of Trends magazine Bunlawala spent most of his time making anti-semetic comments and supporting Hamas. As media secetary of the MCB Bunglawala supports boycotting the holocaust memorial day.
It’s no suprise Bunglawala doesn’t like Quilliam then!
“Those comments were made some 12 or 13 years ago. All of us may hold opinions which are objectionable, but they change over time. I certainly would not defend those comments today.”
- Bungles
Of course there is a world of difference between choosing not to defend some nasty opinions made in those old Trends Magazine editorials and no longer holding them.
Engage also have a go at Quilliam for getting government funding, even though it’s public money that’s been used to draw up this rather tragic hatchet job.
The flakiness of Bunglawala’s argument is extraordinary. Only he could consider nine one-hour long interviews with anonymous “Muslim leaders” representative of all British Muslims, especially when the report itself makes clear that it should not be taken as representative of Redbridge’s Muslims (pp6-7), let alone all the other Muslims in this country.
haha! good one.
Even after manipulating the data from this report, Bunglawala’s tricks shows that the MCB have got as little grassroot support of “mainstream Muslims” as QF. And QF do not even claim to be a grassroots org – that’s supposedly the MCB!
QF must be doing something right if Bungles has still got his knickers in a twist again. This Redbridge Forum is made up of idiots like Mrs Bungles and Abdul Jaffar who organises debates without even informing one side and then pretending they didn’t turn up, he did this with Mike Grapes and Ed Hussain.
Bungles is just upset that no one from the media or government asks him what he thinks anymore, which is what he was building his career on.
Truth is the vast majority of British Muslims don’t have strong views about any of these organisations becaus they don’t really give a shit. Islamists only talk amongst themselves and delude each other into thinking only their opinions count. But at least Bungles is entertaining, a Muslim version of Mr Bean really.
Of course, all of Bungle’s religious festivals came at once when a co-religionist because a minor communities minister (*). Unfortunately, he promptly fell to rather blatant expenses fudging for a second time, and appears terminally wounded. So it’s likely that Blears’ cordon sanitaire around the MCB will be continued, leaving them an obscure fringe group. Again.
(*) Has anyone else noticed that `community’ is a euphemism for `crap that we give the working classes but wouldn’t touch ourselves, darling’? Community school, community college, community hall, community arts project, community theatre, community leader…